februar 19, 2024 0 21 CELEX:62023CN0811: Case C-811/23 P: Appeal brought on 26 December 2023 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 October 2023 in Case T-402/20, Zippo Manufacturing and Others v Commission
junij 26, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0012: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 June 2023.#Autoramiksas UAB v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for annulment and for failure to act – Refusal of the European Commission to initiate proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations – Discretionary power of the Commission – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-12/23 P.
september 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0012_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 June 2023.#Autoramiksas UAB v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for annulment and for failure to act – Refusal of the European Commission to initiate proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations – Discretionary power of the Commission – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-12/23 P.
maj 24, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0015: Order of the Court of 11 May 2023.#Arne-Patrik Heinze v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-15/23 P.
oktober 05, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0015_INF: Order of the Court of 11 May 2023.#Arne-Patrik Heinze v L’Oréal and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-15/23 P.
november 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0017(01): Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 novembre 2023.#Asociación Liberum e.a. contre Parlement européen et Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Santé publique – Règlement (UE) 2022/1034 – Règlement (UE) 2021/953 – Certificat COVID numérique de l’UE – Libre circulation des personnes – Restrictions – Recours en annulation – Absence de qualité pour et d’intérêt à agir – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Pourvoi manifestement non fondé.#Affaire C-17/23 P. This document does not exist in English.
junij 01, 2024 0 27 CELEX:62023CO0017(01)_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 November 2023.#Asociación Liberum and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Case C-17/23 P.
julij 04, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0024: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 27 juin 2023.#Finalgarve – Sociedade de Promoção Imobiliária e Turística SA contre Ministério do Planeamento e das Infraestruturas.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte réglementaire du litige au principal ainsi que des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse aux questions préjudicielles – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-24/23. This document does not exist in English.
september 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0024_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2023.#Finalgarve – Sociedade de Promoção Imobiliária e Turística SA v Ministério do Planeamento e das Infraestruturas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Case C-24/23.
oktober 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0025: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#AL v Princess Holdings.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2), Article 94(b) and (c) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Bills of exchange – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Manifest inadmissibility in part – No jurisdiction of the court of enforcement hearing an objection to assess, of its own motion or at the request of the consumer concerned, the unfairness of the terms of the contract concluded by that consumer with a seller or supplier and forming the basis of the issue of the bills of exchang