Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1114: Case T-1114/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2025 – Melnichenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of a

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1116: Case T-1116/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Khudaverdyan v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of rev

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1117: Case T-1117/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Usmanov v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality –

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1122: Case T-1122/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Nouryon Functional Chemicals and Others v ECHA (REACH – Substance di-tert-butyl 1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetramethylene diperoxide – Compliance check of registrations – Request for additional toxicity studies – Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of fact – Proportionality – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ECHA – Admissibility of the arguments directed against the decision of ECHA)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1123: Case T-1123/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Meucci v Parliament and EEAS (Civil service – Officials – Leaving the service – Automatic retirement – Request for maintenance in service beyond the retirement age – Limitation of the duration of maintenance in service beyond the retirement age – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Interest of the service – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1127: Case T-1127/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Butzkies-Schiemann v EUIPO – U.S. Corrosion Technologies (CorrosionX) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CorrosionX – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Admissibility of the response filed before the Board of Appeal – Article 24(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1129: Case T-1129/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Intel Corporation v Commission (Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Naked restrictions – Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision – Nature of the infringement – Amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Proportionality – Whether appropriate – Unlimited jurisdiction)

RSS
First22142215221622172219222122222223Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top