Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0764_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Cairo Network Srl and Others v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/77/EC – Rights to use digital terrestrial broadcasting radio frequencies for radio and television – Conversion of rights of use – Granting of rights of use – Judicial protection – Independence of national regulatory authorities.#Joined Cases C-764/23 to C-766/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0767: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#A. M. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Obligation to state reasons for the concrete application of those exceptions – National legislation conferring on the national court or tribunal of last instance the power to dismiss actions by means of a summary statement of reasons – Conditions required to reason a refusal to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-767/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0767_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 24 mars 2026.#A. M. contre Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Portée de l’obligation de renvoi préjudiciel des juridictions nationales statuant en dernier ressort – Exceptions à cette obligation – Obligation de motiver l’application concrète de ces exceptions – Réglementation nationale conférant à la juridiction nationale statuant en dernier ressort la faculté de rejeter des recours au moyen d’une motivation sommaire – Conditions requises pour motiver un refus de procéder à un renvoi préjudiciel.#Affaire C-767/23.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0769: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0769_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl contre Ministero della Difesa et Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Passation de marchés publics – Marchés mixtes comportant des aspects ayant trait à la défense – Services directement liés à des équipements militaires – Directive 2009/81/CE – Directive 2014/24/UE – Détermination de la directive applicable – Critères d’attribution du marché – Article 67, paragraphe 2, troisième alinéa, de la directive 2014/24/UE – Interdiction d’utiliser le prix comme seul critère d’attribution – Proportionnalité – Marchés publics de services à forte intensité de main-d’œuvre.#Affaire C-769/23.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0776: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdings –

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0776_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdin

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0781: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#Malmö Motorrenovering AB v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 250 – Temporary admission procedure – Article 251 – Period during which goods imported under that procedure may remain – Period insufficient for achieving the objective of authorised use – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with that period – Conditions for extending that period – Importation of a racing car.#Case C-781/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0781_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#Malmö Motorrenovering AB v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 250 – Temporary admission procedure – Article 251 – Period during which goods imported under that procedure may remain – Period insufficient for achieving the objective of authorised use – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with that period – Conditions for extending that period – Importation of a racing car.#Case C-781/23.

RSS
First21462147214821492151215321542155Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top