september 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0352: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#LF v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum and immigration policy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Scope – Articles 1, 4 and 7 – Directive 2011/95/EU – Scope – Articles 2 and 3 – National protection on humanitarian grounds – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 14 – No possibility of carrying out the removal – Certification – Rights of an illegally staying third-country national in the event of postponement of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Scope – Material Reception Conditions.#Case C-352/23.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0353: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Nouryon Performance Formulations BV, anciennement Nouryon Industrial Chemicals BV v European Commission.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Evaluation of registration dossiers – Request for further studies for the purposes of the evaluation of the registration dossier for dimethyl ether – Decision addressed to the registrant and contested by it before the General Court of the European Union – Subsequent replacement of the registrant at the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Appeal brought by the new registrant – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by an entity which was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – Inadmissib
julij 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0353_INF: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Nouryon Performance Formulations BV, anciennement Nouryon Industrial Chemicals BV v European Commission.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Evaluation of registration dossiers – Request for further studies for the purposes of the evaluation of the registration dossier for dimethyl ether – Decision addressed to the registrant and contested by it before the General Court of the European Union – Subsequent replacement of the registrant at the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Appeal brought by the new registrant – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by an entity which was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – Inadmi
junij 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0364: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning.#Case C-364/23 P.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0364_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning.#Case C-364/23 P.
marec 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0365: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 March 2025.#SIA "A" v C and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Article 2(b) – Article 3(1) – Article 4(2) – Article 5 – Article 6(1) – Article 8a – Pre-formulated standard contract – Contract between a supplier providing services for development and career support for sportspersons and a ‘rising star’ sportsman of minor age represented by his parents – Term establishing the obligation to pay to that supplier remuneration equal to 10% of the income received by that sportsman over the following 15 years – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 17 and 24 – Right to property – Rights of the child.#Case C-365/23.
marec 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0365_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 March 2025.#SIA "A" v C and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Article 2(b) – Article 3(1) – Article 4(2) – Article 5 – Article 6(1) – Article 8a – Pre-formulated standard contract – Contract between a supplier providing services for development and career support for sportspersons and a ‘rising star’ sportsman of minor age represented by his parents – Term establishing the obligation to pay to that supplier remuneration equal to 10% of the income received by that sportsman over the following 15 years – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 17 and 24 – Right to property – Rights of the child.#Case C-365/23.
april 26, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0366: Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 25 avril 2024.#Compagnie industrielle de la matière végétale (CIMV) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Recherche et développement technologique – Convention de subvention conclue dans le cadre du programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation “Horizon 2020” – Recouvrement d’une créance – Remboursement échelonné – Exactitude matérielle des faits – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Obligation de motivation – Confiance légitime – Droit d’être entendu – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-366/23 P. This document does not exist in English.
december 12, 2024 0 21 CELEX:62023CJ0366_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Compagnie industrielle de la matière végétale (CIMV) v European Commission.#Case C-366/23 P.
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0367: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#EA v Artemis security SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 9(1)(a) – Obligation to assess the health of night workers – Employer’s failure to comply with that obligation – Right to compensation – Need to establish the existence of specific harm.#Case C-367/23.