maj 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0530: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#K.P v Prokurator Rejonowy we Włocławku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/1919 – Legal aid – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Procedural safeguards for vulnerable persons – Determination of the vulnerability of those persons – No legal presumption – Direct effect – Interview of a suspect in the absence of a lawyer – Admissibility of evidence obtained in breach of procedural rights.#Case C-530/23.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0530_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Criminal proceedings against Prokurator Rejonowy we Włocławku.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy we Włocławku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/1919 – Legal aid – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Procedural safeguards for vulnerable persons – Determination of the vulnerability of those persons – No legal presumption – Direct effect – Interview of a suspect in the absence of a lawyer – Admissibility of evidence obtained in breach of procedural rights.#Case C-530/23.
december 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0531: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#HJ v US and MU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Daily and weekly rest – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Articles 3, 5, 6, 16, 17, 19 and 22 – Requirement to establish a system enabling the duration of time worked by domestic workers to be measured – Derogation – National legislation exempting domestic workers from the obligation to record actual time worked.#Case C-531/23.
julij 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0534: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Instituto Cervantes and Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#3 July 2025 *Language of the case: French(Appeal – Award of public contracts by the European Union – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Contract for language training services – Obligation to submit tenders via the electronic application eSubmission – Use by a tenderer of a hypertext link to a website containing documents describing the tender – Refusal of the administration to take those documents into consideration – Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Objective impartiality – Obligation to state reasons – Comparative tender evaluation me
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0534_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Instituto Cervantes and Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#3 July 2025 *Language of the case: French(Appeal – Award of public contracts by the European Union – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Contract for language training services – Obligation to submit tenders via the electronic application eSubmission – Use by a tenderer of a hypertext link to a website containing documents describing the tender – Refusal of the administration to take those documents into consideration – Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Objective impartiality – Obligation to state reasons – Comparative tender evaluatio
april 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0536: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Mutua Madrileña Automovilista.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance – Article 11(1)(b) – Article 13(2) – Action brought by an injured party directly against an insurer – Concept of ‘injured party’ – Official injured in a road traffic accident – Continued remuneration during that official’s incapacity to work – Member State acting as the employer subrogated to that official’s rights to compensation – Jurisdiction of the courts for the place where the claimant is domiciled – Place where the administrative body employing that official has its seat.#Case C-536/23.
april 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0536_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Mutua Madrileña Automovilista.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance – Article 11(1)(b) – Article 13(2) – Action brought by an injured party directly against an insurer – Concept of ‘injured party’ – Official injured in a road traffic accident – Continued remuneration during that official’s incapacity to work – Member State acting as the employer subrogated to that official’s rights to compensation – Jurisdiction of the courts for the place where the claimant is domiciled – Place where the administrative body employing that official has its seat.#Case C-536/23.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0537: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Società Italiana Lastre SpA (SIL) v Agora SARL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 25(1) – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Assessment of the validity of the agreement – Imprecise and asymmetric nature – Applicable law – Concept of ‘null and void as to its substantive validity’.#Case C-537/23.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0537_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Società Italiana Lastre SpA (SIL) v Agora SARL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 25(1) – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Assessment of the validity of the agreement – Imprecise and asymmetric nature – Applicable law – Concept of ‘null and void as to its substantive validity’.#Case C-537/23.
maj 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0538: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG and WESTbahn Management GmbH v Schienen-Control Kommission.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure – Establishing, determining and collecting charges – Article 29 – Exceptions to charging principles – Article 32 – Mark-ups – Modalities for calculation and publication – Article 56 – Functions of the regulatory body – Authorisation procedure for mark-ups, provided for by national law – Conditions.#Case C-538/23.