Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0666_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#CM and DS v Volkswagen AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Approval of motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Article 18(1) – Article 26(1) – Article 46 – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Protection of the interests of an individual purchaser of a vehicle equipped with an unlawful defeat device – Installation of that device after the vehicle’s entry into service – Right to compensation from the vehicle manufacturer on the basis of tortious liability – Ground

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0671: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#M v Lietuvos bankas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Article 59 – Concept of ‘systematic infringement’ – Penalties – National legislation or national practice allowing a separate fine to be imposed in respect of each infringement established in the course of one and the same investigation – Compatibility with EU law – Minimum harmonisation – Observance of the general principles of EU law – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions – Principle ne bis in idem.#Case C-671/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0671_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#M v Lietuvos bankas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Article 59 – Concept of ‘systematic infringement’ – Penalties – National legislation or national practice allowing a separate fine to be imposed in respect of each infringement established in the course of one and the same investigation – Compatibility with EU law – Minimum harmonisation – Observance of the general principles of EU law – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions – Principle ne bis in idem.#Case C-671/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0674: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#AEON NEPREMIČNINE, d.o.o. and Others v Državni zbor Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15(2) and (3) – Fixed maximum tariffs – Provider of property intermediation services – National legislation laying down a maximum limit on the commission charged for intermediation services relating to the sale or rental of immovable property by a natural person – Proportionality – Articles 16 and 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Consumer protection.#Case C-674/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0674_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#AEON NEPREMIČNINE d.o.o. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavno sodišče.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15(2) and (3) – Fixed maximum tariffs – Provider of property intermediation services – National legislation laying down a maximum limit on the commission charged for intermediation services relating to the sale or rental of immovable property by a natural person – Proportionality – Articles 16 and 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Consumer protection.#Case C-674/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0677: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#A. B. and F. B. v Slovenská sporiteľňa, a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Requirements relating to information to be included in such a credit agreement – Duty to provide information – Duration of the agreement – Annual percentage rate of charge (APRC) – Assumptions used in order to calculate the APRC.#Case C-677/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0678: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#JU v Spitalul Clinic de Pneumoftiziologie Iaşi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 89/391/EEC – Safety and health of workers at work – Article 9 – Employers’ obligations – Classification of workplaces according to whether they are exposing workers to risk factors to their safety and health – Article 11(6) – Proceedings before the authority responsible for safety and health protection at work – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-678/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0678_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#JU v Spitalul Clinic de Pneumoftiziologie Iaşi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iaşi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 89/391/EEC – Safety and health of workers at work – Article 9 – Employers’ obligations – Classification of workplaces according to whether they are exposing workers to risk factors to their safety and health – Article 11(6) – Proceedings before the authority responsible for safety and health protection at work – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-678/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0679: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0679_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#WS e.a. contre Agence européenne de garde-frontières et de garde-côtes.#Pourvoi – Politique commune en matière d’asile et d’immigration – Règlement (UE) 2016/1624 – Gestion européenne intégrée des frontières extérieures de l’Union européenne – Corps européen de garde-frontières et de garde-côtes – Agence européenne de garde-frontières et de garde-côtes (Frontex) – Obligations incombant à Frontex en matière de protection des droits fondamentaux – Opération de retour conjointe coordonnée par Frontex – Responsabilité extracontractuelle de Frontex – Lien de causalité entre la violation de telles obligations et le préjudice subi.#Affaire C-679/23 P.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First20662067206820692071207320742075Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top