oktober 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0031: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#Ferriere Nord SpA contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Concurrence – Ententes – Marché des ronds à béton – Décision de la Commission européenne constatant une infraction à l’article 65 CA, après l’expiration du traité CECA, sur le fondement du règlement (CE) no 1/2003 – Décision prise à la suite de l’annulation de décisions antérieures – Tenue d’une nouvelle audition en présence des autorités de concurrence des États membres – Droits de la défense – Principe de bonne administration – Exigence d’impartialité – Délai raisonnable – Obligation de motivation – Proportionnalité – Principe ne bis in idem – Exception d’illégalité – Circonstances aggravantes – Récidive – Circonstances atténuantes – Égalité de tra This document does not exist in English.
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0035: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 20 juin 2024.#Père contre Mère.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Responsabilité parentale – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Articles 10 et 11 – Compétence en cas de déplacement illicite d’un enfant – Résidence habituelle de l’enfant dans un État membre avant le déplacement illicite – Procédure de retour entre un pays tiers et un État membre – Notion de “demande de retour” – Convention de La Haye du 25 octobre 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants.#Affaire C-35/23. This document does not exist in English.
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0035_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 20 juin 2024.#Père contre Mère.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Responsabilité parentale – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Articles 10 et 11 – Compétence en cas de déplacement illicite d’un enfant – Résidence habituelle de l’enfant dans un État membre avant le déplacement illicite – Procédure de retour entre un pays tiers et un État membre – Notion de demande de retour – Convention de La Haye du 25 octobre 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants.#Affaire C-35/23. This document does not exist in English.
april 26, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0036: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#L v Familienkasse Sachsen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Family benefits – Article 68 – Rules of priority in the case of overlapping of benefits – Obligation on the institution of the Member State having secondary competence to forward an application for family benefits to the institution of the Member State having primary competence – No application for family benefits in the child’s Member State of residence – Partial recovery of family benefits paid in the Member State of activity as an employed person of one of the parents.#Case C-36/23.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0036_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#L v Familienkasse Sachsen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Family benefits – Article 68 – Rules of priority in the case of overlapping of benefits – Obligation on the institution of the Member State having secondary competence to forward an application for family benefits to the institution of the Member State having primary competence – No application for family benefits in the child’s Member State of residence – Partial recovery of family benefits paid in the Member State of activity as an employed person of one of the parents.#Case C-36/23.
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0039: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Keva and Others v Skatteverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law – Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law – Comparability of situations – Whether justified – Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy – Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States.#Case C-39/23.
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0039_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Keva and Others v Skatteverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law – Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law – Comparability of situations – Whether justified – Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy – Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States.#Case C-39/23.
junij 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0040: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Appeal – State aid – Law prohibiting the use of coal for the production of electricity – Early closure of a coal-powered power plant – Award of compensation – Decision declaring the measure compatible with the internal market without stating whether State aid exists – Exercise of the European Commission’s powers.#Case C-40/23 P.
junij 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0040_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Appeal – State aid – Law prohibiting the use of coal for the production of electricity – Early closure of a coal-powered power plant – Award of compensation – Decision declaring the measure compatible with the internal market without stating whether State aid exists – Exercise of the European Commission’s powers.#Case C-40/23 P.
junij 28, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0041: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2024.#AV and Others v Ministero della Giustizia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clauses 2 and 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Honorary members of the judiciary and ordinary members of the judiciary – Clause 5 – Measures intended to penalise improper use of fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Paid annual leave.#Case C-41/23.