Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0216: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Hauser Weinimport GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Agriculture – Definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products – Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 – Article 3(4) – Aromatised wine-product cocktail – Definition – Concepts of ‘alcohol’ and of ‘flavouring foodstuffs’.#Case C-216/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0216_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Hauser Weinimport GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Agriculture – Definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products – Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 – Article 3(4) – Aromatised wine-product cocktail – Definition – Concepts of ‘alcohol’ and of ‘flavouring foodstuffs’.#Case C-216/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0217: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 March 2025.#Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v A N.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be eligible for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – Article 10(1)(d) – Concept of ‘membership of a particular social group’ – Condition relating to the perception of the group as being different by the surrounding society in the country of origin – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘serious harm’ – Article 15(a) and (b) – Persons who are part of the same family and are targeted by a blood feud because of their family relations

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0217_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 March 2025.#Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v A N.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be eligible for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – Article 10(1)(d) – Concept of ‘membership of a particular social group’ – Condition relating to the perception of the group as being different by the surrounding society in the country of origin – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘serious harm’ – Article 15(a) and (b) – Persons who are part of the same fam

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0222: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Order for payment procedure – Concept of ‘domicile’ – National of a Member State having his or her permanent address in that Member State and his or her current address in another Member State – No possibility of changing or renouncing that permanent address.#Case C-222/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0222_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Order for payment procedure – Concept of ‘domicile’ – National of a Member State having his or her permanent address in that Member State and his or her current address in another Member State – No possibility of changing or renouncing that permanent address.#Case C-222/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0224: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#Penya Barça Lyon : Plus que des supporters (PBL) and Issam Abdelmouine v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Complaint concerning State aid that enabled a football club to hire a player previously employed by another club – Complaint lodged by one of the socios of the latter club, set up as a not-for-profit association – European Commission decision finding that no ‘interested party’ entitled to lodge a complaint is present – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1(h) – Notions of ‘interested party’ and ‘person whose interests might be affected by the granting of aid’.#Case C-224/23 P.

RSS
First20232024202520262028203020312032Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top