november 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0169: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data processed when drawing up a COVID-19 certificate – Data not collected from the data subject – Information to be provided – Exception to the obligation to provide information – Article 14(5)(c) – Data generated by the controller in the context of its own processes – Right to complain – Competence of the supervisory authority – Article 77(1) – Appropriate measures to protect the data subject’s legitimate interests provided for by the Member State law to which the controller is su
oktober 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0171: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#UP CAFFE d.o.o. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Point 19 of Article 287 – VAT exemption scheme for small enterprises – Abusive practice by forming a new company.#Case C-171/23.
marec 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0171_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#UP CAFFE d.o.o. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Zagrebu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Point 19 of Article 287 – VAT exemption scheme for small enterprises – Abusive practice by forming a new company.#Case C-171/23.
april 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0173: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 19 – Compensation for damage occasioned by delay in the carriage of baggage – Assignment to a commercial company of the passenger’s claim against the air carrier – Contractual clause prohibiting such an assignment – Directive 93/13/EC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Review of its own motion of the unfairness of the clause prohibiting the assignment of passenger rights – Detailed rules for that review in the context of a dispute between the assignee company and the air carrier – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Principle of audi
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0173_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Palma de Mallorca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 19 – Compensation for damage occasioned by delay in the carriage of baggage – Assignment to a commercial company of the passenger’s claim against the air carrier – Contractual clause prohibiting such an assignment – Directive 93/13/EC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Review of its own motion of the unfairness of the clause prohibiting the assignment of passenger rights – Detailed rules for that review in the context of a dispute between the assignee c
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0174: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#HJ and Others v Twenty First Capital SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2011/61/EU – Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) – Operating conditions – Article 13 – AIFM remuneration policies and practices – Scope ratione temporis – Article 61 – Transitional provisions.#Case C-174/23.
maj 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0176: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#UG v SC Raiffeisen Bank SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 1(2) – Scope – Exclusion of contractual terms reflecting mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions – Supplementary agreement to a credit agreement notified by the seller or supplier to the consumer for the purpose of complying with national legislation – Article 3(2) – Contractual term which has not been individually negotiated – Failure of the consumer to sign the supplementary agreement – Presumption of tacit acceptance of that supplementary agreement – National case-law precluding the courts from reviewing whether a contractual term contained in such a supplementary agreement is un
februar 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0176_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#UG v SC Raiffeisen Bank SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 1(2) – Scope – Exclusion of contractual terms reflecting mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions – Supplementary agreement to a credit agreement notified by the seller or supplier to the consumer for the purpose of complying with national legislation – Article 3(2) – Contractual term which has not been individually negotiated – Failure of the consumer to sign the supplementary agreement – Presumption of tacit acceptance of that supplementary agreement – National case-law precluding the courts from reviewing
november 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0178: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#ERB New Europe Funding II v YI.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Powers and obligations of the national court – First legal remedy pursued by the consumer before the court of the place where the seller or supplier has its registered office, without the assistance of a lawyer and without that consumer attending the hearing – Second legal remedy pursued by the consumer before the court of his or her place of domicile, with the assistance of a lawyer – Res judicata – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection of the consumer.#Case C-178/23.
marec 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0178_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#ERB New Europe Funding II v YI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Powers and obligations of the national court – First legal remedy pursued by the consumer before the court of the place where the seller or supplier has its registered office, without the assistance of a lawyer and without that consumer attending the hearing – Second legal remedy pursued by the consumer before the court of his or her place of domicile, with the assistance of a lawyer – Res judicata – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effec