marec 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0134_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Somateio «Elliniko Symvoulio gia tous Prosfyges» and Astiki Mi Kerdoskopiki Etaireia «Ypostirixi Prosfygon sto Aigaio» v Ypourgos Exoterikon and Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Granting of international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 38 – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Classification of the Republic of Türkiye as a ‘safe third country’ – Readmission of applicants for international protection in third countries – Refusal.#Case C-134/23.
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0135: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) v GL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Communication to the public – Concept – Mere provision of physical facilities – Provision in apartments of television sets equipped with an indoor antenna enabling signals to be picked up and broadcasts to be made – Profit-making nature – Principle of technological neutrality.#Case C-135/23.
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0135_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 juin 2024.#Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) contre GL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Propriété intellectuelle – Droit d’auteur et droits voisins – Directive 2001/29/CE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Communication au public – Notion – Simple fourniture d’installations – Mise à disposition dans des appartements d’appareils de télévision équipés d’une antenne d’intérieur permettant la captation de signaux et la diffusion d’émissions – Caractère lucratif – Principe de neutralité technologique.#Affaire C-135/23. This document does not exist in English.
marec 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0137: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#X v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Exemption of energy products used as fuel – Article 14(1)(c) – Navigation within EU waters – Article 15(1)(f) – Navigation on inland waterways – Directive 95/60/EC – Fiscal marking of gas oils and kerosene – Gas oil, to which fiscal marking has not been applied in accordance with EU law, intended for use for the propulsion of a vessel – Refusal to apply the exemption from payment of excise duty – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-137/23.
marec 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0137_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#X v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Exemption of energy products used as fuel – Article 14(1)(c) – Navigation within EU waters – Article 15(1)(f) – Navigation on inland waterways – Directive 95/60/EC – Fiscal marking of gas oils and kerosene – Gas oil, to which fiscal marking has not been applied in accordance with EU law, intended for use for the propulsion of a vessel – Refusal to apply the exemption from payment of excise duty – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-137/23.
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0143: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#KI and FA v Mercedes-Benz Bank AG and Volkswagen Bank GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreement for the purchase of a motor vehicle – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 10(2)(l) – Requirements relating to the information to be included in the agreement – Obligation to specify the interest rate applicable in the case of late payments – Article 14(1) – Right of withdrawal – Commencement of the withdrawal period in the absence of any reference to the interest rate applicable in the case of late payments – Unfairness of the exercise of the right of withdrawal – Consequences of exercising the right of withdrawal in the context of a c
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0143_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#KI and FA v Mercedes-Benz Bank AG and Volkswagen Bank GmbH.#Preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreement for the purchase of a motor vehicle – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 10(2)(l) – Requirements relating to the information to be included in the agreement – Obligation to specify the interest rate applicable in the case of late payments – Article 14(1) – Right of withdrawal – Commencement of the withdrawal period in the absence of any reference to the interest rate applicable in the case of late payments – Unfairness of the exercise of the right of withdrawal – Consequences of exercising the right of withdrawal in the context of a credit agreement linked to a vehicle purchase agreement – Consu
oktober 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0144: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law to the supreme court of a Member State – Request by the party seeking leave to appeal on a point of law that a question concerning the interpretation of EU law be referred to the Court of Justice – National legislation under which leave to appeal on a point of law is to be granted if the appeal raises a question of law that is important for ensuring legal certainty, the uniform application of the law or it
oktober 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0144_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 15 octobre 2024.#KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. contre Republika Slovenija.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Portée de l’obligation de renvoi préjudiciel des juridictions nationales statuant en dernier ressort – Procédure d’autorisation d’un pourvoi en révision devant la juridiction suprême d’un État membre – Demande par la partie qui demande l’autorisation d’un pourvoi en révision de saisir la Cour d’une question relative à l’interprétation du droit de l’Union – Réglementation nationale en vertu de laquelle le pourvoi en révision est autorisé lorsqu’il soulève une question de droit importante pour assurer la sécurité juridique, l’application uniforme du droit ou le développement de celui-ci – Obliga This document does not exist in English.
februar 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0146: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#XL v Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku.#References for a preliminary ruling – Freezing or reduction of remuneration in the national public administration – Measures specifically aimed at judges – Article 2 TEU – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Possibility of derogating from those rules – Conditions.#Case C-146/23.