Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0577: Case C-577/23: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Estonia (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Guarantees of independence and resources for national competition authorities in order to implement Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Failure to transpose and to notify the transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Financial penalties – Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a daily penalty payment)

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0578: Case C-578/23, Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 31(1)(b) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Conditions – Technical reasons – Reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights – Attributable to the contracting authority – Factual and legal circumstances to be taken into consideration)

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0579: Case C-579/23 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – Cunsorziu di i Salamaghji Corsi – Consortium des Charcutiers Corses and Others v European Commission (Appeal – Protection of designations of origin and geographical indications – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Articles 7 and 8 – Article 49(2) and Article 50(1) – Scope of the European Commission’s control of the applications for registration of a name as a geographical indication – Division of powers between the national authorities and the Commission – Conditions for registration of a name)

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0580: Joined Cases C-580/23 and C-795/23, Mio and Others: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen and Bundesgerichtshof – Sweden, Germany) – Mio AB, Mio e-handel AB, Mio Försäljning AB (C-580/23), USM U. Schärer Söhne AG (C-795/23) v Galleri Mikael & Thomas Asplund Aktiebolag (C-580/23), konektra GmbH, LN (C-795/23) (References for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 – Reproduction right – Concept of work – Copyright protection of works of applied art – Assessment of the originality of subject matter of applied art – Concept of free and creative

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0581: Case C-581/23, Beevers Kaas: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen – Belgium) – Beevers Kaas BV v Albert Heijn België NV, Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV, Albert Heijn BV, Ahold België BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Prohibition – Vertical agreements – Article 101(3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 – Block exemption – Article 4(b)(i) – Hardcore restriction that removes the benefit of that exemption – Exception – Exclusive distribution agreements – Restriction of active sales in an exclusive territory – Concept of agreement – Concurrence of wills between the supplier and its buyers – Proof – Exclusive territory alloc

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0582: Case C-582/23, Wiszkier: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi – Poland) – R.S. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Powers and obligations of the national court – Insolvency proceedings relating to a natural person – Bankruptcy court has no power to examine ex officio whether the terms of a contract that gave rise to a claim on the list of claims are unfair – No power for that court to order interim measures – Principle of effectiveness)

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0583: Case C-583/23, Delda: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – in the proceedings on the recognition and execution of a European Investigation Order concerning AK (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Material scope – Concept of investigative measure – Service of an indictment accompanied by an order that the person be remanded in custody pending trial and make a bail payment – Hearing of the accused person)

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0584: Case C-584/23, Alcampo and Others: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Barcelona – Spain) – Asepeyo Mutua Colaboradora de la Seguridad Social no 151, KT v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS), Alcampo SA, legal successor to Supermercados Sabeco SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security – Directive 79/7/EEC – Article 4(1) – Indirect discrimination on ground of sex – Method of calculating the pension for permanent incapacity as a result of an accident at work – Taking into account the actual remuneration on the date of the accident at work – Reduction

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0586: Case C-586/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2025 – Giovanni Frajese v European Commission (Appeal – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Spikevax – Comirnaty – Action for annulment – Independence and impartiality of the Courts of the European Union – Failure to comply with procedural rules – Failure to give adequate reasons, and contradictory reasoning – Legal interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Right to effective judicial protection)

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0587: C-587/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 March 2025 – Hungary v Commission (Double funding for wooded land) (Appeal – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (FEAGA) – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 30 – Prohibition of double funding – Scope – Funding with same objective – Regulation (UE) No 1305/2013 – Articles 21 and 22 – Aid for afforestation – Regulation (UE) No 1307/2013 – Articles 43 and 46 – Aid for greening – Overlapping of aid for afforestation and greening for the same wooded land – Compensation for the same loss of income)

RSS
First19971998199920002002200420052006Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top