Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0109: Case C-109/23, Jemerak: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin – Germany) – GM, ON v PR (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5n(2) and (6) – Prohibition on the direct or indirect provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government or to legal persons, entities or bodies established in Russia – Exemption concerning the provision of services which are strictly necessary to ensure access to judicial, administrative or arbitration proceedings in a Member State – Authentication and execution, by a notary, of a contr

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0112: Case C-112/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 October 2024 – PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri, PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v European Commission (Appeal – Subsidies – Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 – Definitive countervailing duty – Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Article 7 – Calculation of the amount of benefit – Article 8(1) and (2) – Price undercutting – Price pressure)

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0118: Case C-118/23, Getin Holding and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie – Poland) – Rada Nadzorcza Getin Noble Bank S.A. and Others v Bankowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions – Directive 2014/59/EU – Decision to take a crisis management measure in respect of a credit institution – Article 85(3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy of all persons affected by that decision – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Requirement of an expeditious judicial review – Provision of national law requiring that all the actions be joi

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0119: Case C-119/23, Valančius: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – Virgilijus Valančius v Lietuvos Republikos Vyriausybė (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Third subparagraph of Article 19(2) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 254 TFEU – Appointment of Judges of the General Court of the European Union – Independence beyond doubt – Ability required for appointment to high judicial office – National procedure for proposing a candidate for the office of Judge of the General Court of the European Union – Group of independent experts responsible for assessing the candidates – Merit list of candidates meeting the requirements laid down in the third subparagraph o

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0121: Case C-121/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025 – Swissgrid AG v European Commission (Appeal – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Article 1(6) and (7) – Transmission system operators (TSOs) – Participation in European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Concept of challengeable act – Letter from the European Commission refusing the participation of a TSO operating in Switzerland in European platforms)

0 0

CELEX:62023CA0123: Joined Cases C-123/23 and C-202/23, Khan Yunis and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden – Germany) – N.A.K., E.A.K., Y.A.K. (C-123/23), M.E.O. (C-202/23) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Grounds for inadmissibility – Article 2(q) – Concept of subsequent application – Article 33(2)(d) – Rejection of an application for international protection as inadmissible by a Member State due to the rejection of a previo

RSS
First19701971197219731975197719781979Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top