oktober 12, 2023 0 45 CELEX:62022TJ0662_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#Zalina Tavitova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-662/22.
november 22, 2023 0 34 CELEX:62022TJ0663_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-663/22.
november 22, 2023 0 35 CELEX:62022TJ0664_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-664/22.
november 09, 2023 0 37 CELEX:62022TJ0665: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 November 2023.#SkinIdent AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-665/22.
julij 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0667: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#SBM Développement SAS v European Commission.#Biocidal products – Authorisation through mutual recognition – Biocidal product Pat’Appât Souricide Canadien Foudroyant – Commission decision on unresolved objections – Articles 35, 36 and 48 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Cancellation or amendment of marketing authorisations – Action for annulment – Direct concern – Individual concern – Admissibility – Conditions for granting an authorisation – Article 19(1) of Regulation No 528/2012 – Article 19(5) of Regulation No 528/2012 – Competence of the Commission – Concept of ‘national authorisation’ – Concept of ‘reference Member State’ – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-667/22.
julij 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0667_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#SBM Développement SAS v European Commission.#Biocidal products – Authorisation through mutual recognition – Biocidal product Pat’Appât Souricide Canadien Foudroyant – Commission decision on unresolved objections – Articles 35, 36 and 48 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Cancellation or amendment of marketing authorisations – Action for annulment – Direct concern – Individual concern – Admissibility – Conditions for granting an authorisation – Article 19(1) of Regulation No 528/2012 – Article 19(5) of Regulation No 528/2012 – Competence of the Commission – Concept of ‘national authorisation’ – Concept of ‘reference Member State’ – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-667/22.
oktober 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0669: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-669/22.
oktober 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0669_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-669/22.