Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0827: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing financial difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-827/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0827_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing financial difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-827/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0830: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 February 2025.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – Partial failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures in the context of an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of amounts receivable by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case T-830/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0830_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 February 2025.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – Partial failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures in the context of an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of amounts receivable by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case T-830/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0831:           Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 19 juin 2024.#TO contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour l’asile.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Contrat à durée déterminée – Résiliation du contrat – Article 47, sous b), ii, du RAA – Rupture du lien de confiance – Droit d’être entendu – Principe de bonne administration – Devoir de sollicitude – Détournement de pouvoir – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire T-831/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0831_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 19 juin 2024.#TO contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour l’asile.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Contrat à durée déterminée – Résiliation du contrat – Article 47, sous b), ii, du RAA – Rupture du lien de confiance – Droit d’être entendu – Principe de bonne administration – Devoir de sollicitude – Détournement de pouvoir – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire T-831/22.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First18211822182318241826182818291830Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top