Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0648: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union.#Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches – Fish stocks shared with the United Kingdom – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom – Regulation (EU) 2022/515 – Request for internal review of an administrative act under environmental law – Article 2(1)(f) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing obliga

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0648_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union.#Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches – Fish stocks shared with the United Kingdom – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom – Regulation (EU) 2022/515 – Request for internal review of an administrative act under environmental law – Article 2(1)(f) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing ob

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0653:           Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 10 décembre 2025.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) contre Commission européenne.#Recherche et développement technologique – Programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation “Horizon 2020” (2014-2020) – Recouvrement des sommes indûment versées en application d’une convention de subvention – Contestation du bien-fondé d’une créance contractuelle devenue définitive – Sécurité juridique – Moyen irrecevable – Principe de bonne administration – Obligation de diligence.#Affaire T-653/22.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First18071808180918101812181418151816Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top