Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0521_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – Benefiting from the regime – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-521/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0523: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank banka – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Right to be heard – Effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014.#Case T-523/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0524: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Sberbank – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Right to be heard – Effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014.#Case T-524/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0528: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Belaruskali AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – State-owned undertaking – Benefiting from the regime – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0528_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Belaruskali AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – State-owned undertaking – Benefiting from the regime – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0534: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Belarusian Potash Company AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – Benefiting from the regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-534/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0534_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Belarusian Potash Company AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – Benefiting from the regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-534/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0535:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 18 octobre 2023.#NZ contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Recrutement – Concours interne COM/1/AD 10/18 – Décision de ne pas inscrire le nom du requérant sur la liste de réserve – Égalité de traitement – Stabilité de la composition du jury – Compétence de pleine juridiction – Préjudice moral.#Affaire T-535/22.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First17941795179617971799180118021803Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top