Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0410_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 17 juillet 2024.#Crédit agricole SA e.a. contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour la période de contribution 2022 – Article 70, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Erreur de droit – Limitation des effets de l’arrêt dans le temps.#Affaire T-410/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0411:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 10 avril 2024.#Dexia, anciennement Dexia Crédit Local contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour la période de contribution 2022 – Article 70, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Erreur de droit – Limitation des effets de l’arrêt dans le temps.#Affaire T-411/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0411_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2024.#Dexia, anciennement Dexia Crédit Local v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-411/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0412: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance dimoxystrobin – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Length of the extension – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.#Case T-412/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0412_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance dimoxystrobin – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Length of the extension – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.#Case T-412/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0416: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 May 2024.#Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Suspension of national marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing the active substance hydroxyethyl starch (HES), solutions for infusion – Action for annulment – Direct concern – Partial inadmissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Precautionary principle – Proportionality – Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC.#Case T-416/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022TJ0416_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 May 2024.#Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Suspension of national marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing the active substance hydroxyethyl starch (HES), solutions for infusion – Action for annulment – Direct concern – Partial inadmissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Precautionary principle – Proportionality – Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC.#Case T-416/22.

RSS
First17811782178317841786178817891790Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top