december 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0689: Case T-689/22: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – SN v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Leave on personal grounds – Commission decision imposing restrictions on engaging in an outside activity – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment)
oktober 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0694: Case T-694/22: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – CMT v EUIPO – Camomilla (CAMOMILLA italia) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CAMOMILLA italia – Earlier EU word mark CAMOMILLA – Relative ground for refusal – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Power of the Court to alter decisions)
februar 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0702: Cases T-702/22, T-704/22, T-705/22 and T-710/22 to T-712/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TA and Others v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State Aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Freedom of establishment – Free movement of workers, citizens and capital – Recovery – Legitimate e
januar 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0713: Cases T-713/22 and T-720/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Portumo – Madeira and Others v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering recovery of aid paid under it – Concept of existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Freedom of movement for workers)
februar 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0716: Case T-716/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – Administradora Fortaleza and Others v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of State aid – Concept of existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – No derogation from the condition relating to the creation or maintenance of jobs in the Autonomous Region of Madeira
december 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0724: Cases T-724/22 and T-725/22: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Neottolemo and Register.com v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Actions for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of 'state aid' – Fiscal autonomy of the Member States – Concept of 'existing aid' within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Unjust enrichment)
oktober 30, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0728: Case T-728/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Industrias Lácteas Asturianas v EUIPO — Qingdao United Dairy (NAMLAC) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark NAMLAC — Earlier Spanish figurative mark Analac — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
februar 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0732: Case T-732/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – Deripaska v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of leading businessperson – Concept of businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(a) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection and rights of the d
januar 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0734: Case T-734/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Pumpyanskiy v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threating the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list — Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Concept of ‘association’ — Error of assessment)
marec 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0736: Case T-736/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Campofrio Food Group v EUIPO — Cerioti Holding (SNACK MI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark SNACK MI — Earlier national figurative marks CAMPOFRIO SNACK’IN — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)