julij 04, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0720: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.#QN v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Appraisal report – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part.#Case C-720/22 P.
september 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0720_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.#QN v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Appraisal report – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part.#Case C-720/22 P.
marec 30, 2023 0 2 CELEX:62022CO0732: Order of the Court of 23 March 2023.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-732/22 P.
junij 22, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0732_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 March 2023.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-732/22 P.
marec 31, 2023 0 2 CELEX:62022CO0735: Order of the Court of 24 March 2023.#Primagran sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-735/22 P.
junij 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0735_INF: Order of the Court of 24 March 2023.#Primagran sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-735/22 P.
marec 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0739: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 20 March 2023.#Xpand Consortium and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Public procurement – Application for interim measures – Admissibility of new claims – Interest in bringing proceedings – Initiation of a new proceeding – Loss of subject matter of the application for interim measures put forward at first instance.#Case C-739/22 P(R).
avgust 29, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0739_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 20 March 2023.#Xpand Consortium and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Public procurement – Application for interim measures – Admissibility of new claims – Interest in bringing proceedings – Initiation of a new proceeding – Loss of subject matter of the application for interim measures put forward at first instance.#Case C-739/22 P(R).
december 06, 2023 0 23 CELEX:62022CO0742: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 29 novembre 2023.#Ntinos Ramon contre Commission européenne.#Demande d’autorisation de pratiquer une saisie-arrêt entre les mains de la Commission européenne.#Affaire C-742/22 SA. This document does not exist in English.
marec 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0748: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 26 février 2025.#E.B. contre Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte factuel du litige au principal et des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une interprétation de certaines dispositions du droit de l’Union par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-748/22. This document does not exist in English.