Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0342_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-342/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0357: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Refusal of access to personal data allegedly held by the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Complaints to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) following the refusal of access – Action directed against the implied rejection of the complaints – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0357_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Refusal of access to personal data allegedly held by the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Complaints to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) following the refusal of access – Action directed against the implied rejection of the complaints – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfou

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0405: Order of the Court of 8 November 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-405/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0405_INF: Order of the Court of 8 November 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-405/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0410:           Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 17 janvier 2023.#KL e.a. contre Skarb Państwa - Sąd Okręgowy w Koszalinie, Sąd Rejonowy w Szczecinku e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-410/22.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First17511752175317541756175817591760Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top