marec 07, 2023 0 71 CELEX:62022TJ0141: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#Sport1 GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-141/22.
maj 05, 2023 0 57 CELEX:62022TJ0141_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#Sport1 GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-141/22.
julij 18, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0142: Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 17 juillet 2024 (Extraits).#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour 2017 – Obligation de motivation – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Égalité de traitement – Principe de proportionnalité – Marge d’appréciation du CRU – Exception d’illégalité – Marge d’appréciation de la Commission – Limitation des effets de l’arrêt dans le temps.#Affaire T-142/22. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0142_RES: Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 17 juillet 2024 (Extraits).#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour 2017 – Obligation de motivation – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Égalité de traitement – Principe de proportionnalité – Marge d’appréciation du CRU – Exception d’illégalité – Marge d’appréciation de la Commission – Limitation des effets de l’arrêt dans le temps.#Affaire T-142/22. This document does not exist in English.
junij 07, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0143: Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 7 juin 2023 (Extraits).#OP contre Parlement européen.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension de survie – Refus d’octroi – Conjoint survivant – Conditions d’éligibilité – Durée du mariage – Exception d’illégalité – Article 80, premier alinéa, du statut – Article 2 de l’annexe VII du statut – Pension d’orphelin – Refus d’octroi – Notion d’ « enfant à charge » – Erreur de droit.#Affaire T-143/22. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0143_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 June 2023 (Extracts).#OP v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Survivor’s pension – Refusal to grant – Surviving spouse – Eligibility conditions – Duration of the marriage – Plea of illegality – Article 80, first paragraph, of the Staff Regulations – Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Orphans’ pension – Refusal to grant – Concept of ‘dependent child’ – Error of law.#Case T-143/22.
junij 28, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0145: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 June 2023.#CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle – Earlier national trade marks – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Concept of ‘agent’ or ‘representative’ – Requirement for a direct contractual agreement.#Case T-145/22.
avgust 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0145_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 June 2023.#CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle – Earlier national trade marks – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Concept of ‘agent’ or ‘representative’ – Requirement for a direct contractual agreement.#Case T-145/22.
februar 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0146: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Netherlands to KLM in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic – State guarantee for a bank loan and a subordinated loan by the State – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market – Admissibility – Determination of the beneficiary of the aid in the context of a group of companies.#Case T-146/22.
maj 24, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TJ0146_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Netherlands to KLM in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic – State guarantee for a bank loan and a subordinated loan by the State – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market – Admissibility – Determination of the beneficiary of the aid in the context of a group of companies.#Case T-146/22.