Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022TA0044: Case T-44/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — International Masis Tabak v EUIPO — Philip Morris Brands (Representation of a pack of cigarettes) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes — Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62022TA0045: Case T-45/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Weider Germany v EUIPO — Den i Nosht (YIPPIE!) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark YIPPIE! — Earlier EU word mark Yuppie — Relative ground for invalidity — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))

0 0

CELEX:62022TA0052: Case T-52/22: Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — Chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v EUIPO — Ambrosetti Group (TEHA) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the European Union figurative mark TEHA — Earlier national figurative mark tema — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of genuine use of the mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark — Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), secon

0 0

CELEX:62022TA0056: Case T-56/22: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2024 — United Kingdom v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Conformity clearance procedure — Action for annulment — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom — Representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement — Locus standi — Admissibility — Active farmer — Concept of ‘group of natural or legal persons’)

RSS
First16681669167016711673167516761677Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top