oktober 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0302: Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 3. Oktober 2022.#YS und RW gegen Freebird Airlines Europe Ltd.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Art. 99 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Luftverkehr – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 261/2004 – Art. 5 Abs. 3 – Ausgleichsleistungen für Fluggäste bei großer Verspätung von Flügen – Befreiung von der Ausgleichspflicht – Außergewöhnliche Umstände – Kollision eines Flugzeugs mit einem Vogel – Vollbremsung, die zur Beschädigung der Reifen dieses Flugzeugs führt.#Rechtssache C-302/22. This document does not exist in English.
februar 02, 2023 0 136 CELEX:62022CO0302_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2022.#YS and RW v Freebird Airlines Europe Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Eilenburg.#Case C-302/22.
maj 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0306: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 April 2023.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer representing the appellant as a third party – Requirement of independence – Lawyer working in the same law firm as the appellant.#Case C-306/22 P.
julij 04, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0306_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 April 2023.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer representing the appellant as a third party – Requirement of independence – Lawyer working in the same law firm as the appellant.#Case C-306/22 P.
januar 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0315: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents allegedly held by the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Action directed against the implied rejection of the request for access to documents – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-315/22 P.
april 28, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0315_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents allegedly held by the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Action directed against the implied rejection of the request for access to documents – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-315/22 P.
januar 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0317: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 November 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents allegedly held by the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Action directed against the express rejection of the request for access to documents – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-317/22 P.
junij 05, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0317_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 November 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents allegedly held by the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Action directed against the express rejection of the request for access to documents – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-317/22 P.
oktober 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0320: Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 28 septembre 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-320/22 P. This document does not exist in English.
januar 16, 2023 0 74 CELEX:62022CO0320_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeal may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-320/22 P.