junij 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0466_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#V.B. Trade OOD v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' – Veliko Tarnovo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 25 – Electronic signatures – Legal effect and evidential value in legal proceedings – Concept of ‘qualified electronic signature’.#Case C-466/22.
junij 29, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0467: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the measure must be of individual concern to the applicant – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures.#Case C-467/22 P.
september 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0467_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the measure must be of individual concern to the applicant – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures.#Case C-467/22 P.
januar 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0471: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 30 janvier 2024.#Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“ contre Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Transport“ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia „Koordinatsia na programi i proekti“ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fonds de cohésion de l’Union européenne – Règlement (CE) no 1083/2006 – Articles 99 et 101 – Corrections financières en rapport avec des irrégularités détectées – Règlement (UE) 2021/1060 – Article 104 – Corrections financières effectuées par la Commission – Décision de la Commission annulant en partie une contribution de ce fonds – Validité – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 41 – Droit à une bonne administration – Article 47, premier aliné This document does not exist in English.
november 16, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0472: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 November 2023.#NO v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Articles 63 and 65 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Personal income tax – Tax advantage relating to the taxation of capital gains on transfers of shares in small enterprises – Exclusion of undertakings established in other Member States – Concept of ‘abusive practice’.#Case C-472/22.
januar 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0473: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Mylan AB v Gilead Sciences Finland Oy and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual and industrial property – Medicinal product for human use – Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 9(7) – Placing on the market of products infringing SPC rights – Provisional measures ordered on the basis of an SPC – Subsequent invalidity of the SPC and revocation of the measures – Consequences – Right to appropriate compensation for losses caused by the provisional measures – Liability of the applicant for those measures for losses caused by them – National legislation providing for strict liability.#Case C-473/22.
junij 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0473_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Mylan AB v Gilead Sciences Finland Oy and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual and industrial property – Medicinal product for human use – Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 9(7) – Placing on the market of products infringing SPC rights – Provisional measures ordered on the basis of an SPC – Subsequent invalidity of the SPC and revocation of the measures – Consequences – Right to appropriate compensation for losses caused by the provisional measures – Liability of the applicant for those measures for losses caused by them – National legislation providing for strict liability.#Case C-473/22.
januar 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0474: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Laudamotion GmbH v Flightright GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(2)(a) – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Requirement to present oneself for check-in in good time.#Case C-474/22.
junij 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0474_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Laudamotion GmbH v Flightright GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(2)(a) – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Requirement to present oneself for check-in in good time.#Case C-474/22.
november 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0477: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#ARST SpA – Azienda regionale sarda trasporti v TR and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 3(a) – Concept of ‘route covered by the service in question [not exceeding] 50 km’ – Carriage by road by vehicles used for the carriage of passengers on regular services – Route covered by the service in question not exceeding 50 km – Non-application of Regulation No 561/2006 – Mixed-use vehicles – Article 4(e) and (j) – Concepts of ‘other work’ and ‘driving time’ – Article 6(3) and (5) – Total driving time over two consecutive weeks – Time spent driving a vehicle excluded from the scope of that regulation.#Case C-477