Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0608: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#AH and FN v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be granted refugee status – Article 2(d) and (e) – Concept of ‘act of persecution’ – Level of seriousness required – Article 9 – Sufficiently severe accumulation of measures that discriminate against women – Article 9(1)(b) – Types of acts of persecution – Article 9(2) – Assessment of applications for international protection – Article 4(3) – Obligation to carry out an individual assessment – Scope.#Joined Cases C-608/22 and C-609/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0611: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Illumina, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – Genetic sequencing systems – Acquisition by Illumina Inc. of sole control over Grail LLC – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Article 22 – Referral request from a national competition authority not having competence under national law to examine the concentration – Decision of the European Commission to examine that concentration – Commission decisions accepting requests from other national competition authorities to join the referral request – Competence of the Commission – Legal certainty.#Case C-611/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0611_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Illumina, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – Genetic sequencing systems – Acquisition by Illumina Inc. of sole control over Grail LLC – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Article 22 – Referral request from a national competition authority not having competence under national law to examine the concentration – Decision of the European Commission to examine that concentration – Commission decisions accepting requests from other national competition authorities to join the referral request – Competence of the Commission – Legal certainty.#Case C-611/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0611_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Illumina, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – Genetic sequencing systems – Acquisition by Illumina Inc. of sole control over Grail LLC – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Article 22 – Referral request from a national competition authority not having competence under national law to examine the concentration – Decision of the European Commission to examine that concentration – Commission decisions accepting requests from other national competition authorities to join the referral request – Competence of the Commission – Legal certainty.#Case C-611/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0614: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#XXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Mother of minor refugee children in Belgium – Mother who is a ‘family member’ within the meaning of Article 2(j) of that directive – Application for the grant of international protection, as a derived right, submitted by that mother – Rejection – No obligation on Member States to recognise the right of the person concerned to obtain that protection if she does not individually qualify for it – Article 20 and Article 23(2) of that directive – Inapplicability.#Case C-614/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0614_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#XXX v Commissioner-General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (Family unity).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Mother of minor refugee children in Belgium – Mother who is a ‘family member’ within the meaning of Article 2(j) of that directive – Application for the grant of international protection, as a derived right, submitted by that mother – Rejection – No obligation on Member States to recognise the right of the person concerned to obtain that protection if she does not individually qualify for it – Article 20 and Article 23(2) of that directive – Inapplicability.#Case C-614/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0621: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Koninklijke Nederlandse Lawn Tennisbond v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(a) – Lawfulness of processing – Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Necessity of processing for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party – Concept of ‘legitimate interests’ – Commercial interest – Sports federation – Disclosure, for consideration, of the personal data of the members of a sports federation to sponsors without the consent of those members.#Case C-621/22.

RSS
First16031604160516061608161016111612Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top