december 22, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0086: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 21 décembre 2023.#Papier Mettler Italia S.r.l. contre Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (già Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare) et Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Environnement – Directive 94/62/CE – Emballages et déchets d’emballages – Directive 98/34/CE – Procédure d’information dans le domaine des normes et réglementations techniques et des règles relatives aux services de la société de l’information – Obligation des États membres de notifier à la Commission européenne tout projet de règle technique – Réglementation nationale prévoyant des règles techniques plus restrictives que celles prévues par la réglementation de l’Union This document does not exist in English.
marec 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0086_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2023.#Papier Mettler Italia S.r.l. v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica and Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Environment – Directive 94/62/EC – Packaging and packaging waste – Directive 98/34/EC – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Obligation on the Member States to notify the European Commission of any draft technical regulation – National legislation containing stricter technical rules than those laid down by EU legislation.#Case C-86/22.
julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0087: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#TT v AK.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 10 and 15 – Transfer to a court of another Member State better placed to hear the case – Conditions – Court of the Member State to which the child has been wrongfully removed – The 1980 Hague Convention – Best interests of the child.#Case C-87/22.
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0087_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#TT v AK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 10 and 15 – Transfer to a court of another Member State better placed to hear the case – Conditions – Court of the Member State to which the child has been wrongfully removed – The 1980 Hague Convention – Best interests of the child.#Case C-87/22.
oktober 19, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0088: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023.#QB v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4(1)(a), second indent – Temporary staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Conditions for granting – Main occupation – Work done for another State.#Case C-88/22 P.
marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0088_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023.#QB v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4(1)(a), second indent – Temporary staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Conditions for granting – Main occupation – Work done for another State.#Case C-88/22 P.
marec 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0090: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#“Gjensidige” ADB v „Rhenus Logistics“ UAB and „ACC Distribution“ UAB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 45 – Refusal to recognise a judgment – Article 71 – Relationship between that regulation and conventions governing particular matters – Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) – Article 31(3) – Lis pendens – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Concept of ‘public policy’.#Case C-90/22.
maj 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0090_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#“Gjensidige” ADB v „Rhenus Logistics“ UAB and „ACC Distribution“ UAB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 45 – Refusal to recognise a judgment – Article 71 – Relationship between that regulation and conventions governing particular matters – Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) – Article 31(3) – Lis pendens – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Concept of ‘public policy’.#Case C-90/22.
december 22, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0096: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 21. Dezember 2023.#CDIL ̶ Companhia de Distribuição Integral Logística Portugal, S.A. gegen Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Freier Warenverkehr – Art. 34 AEUV – Mengenmäßige Einfuhrbeschränkungen – Maßnahmen gleicher Wirkung – Nationale Regelung, die die Zigarettenmengen, die in einem bestimmten Zeitraum in den steuerrechtlich freien Verkehr überführt werden dürfen, auf eine Höchstmenge beschränkt, die dem monatlichen Durchschnitt der in den vorangegangenen zwölf Monaten in den steuerrechtlich freien Verkehr überführten Mengen entspricht – Art. 36 AEUV – Rechtfertigung – Bekämpfung von Steuerhinterziehung und missbräuchlichen Verhaltensweisen – Schutz der öffentlichen Gesundheit – S This document does not exist in English.
maj 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0097: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#DC v HJ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 14(4)(a)(i) and (5) – Right of withdrawal for off-premises contracts – Information requirements for the trader concerned – Failure of that trader to inform the consumer – Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal – Withdrawal after the performance of the contract – Consequences.#Case C-97/22.