Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0581: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#thyssenkrupp AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Concentration between undertakings – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement – Determination of the relevant markets – Significant impediment to effective competition – Creation or strengthening of a dominant position – Non-coordinated effects – Standard of proof – Concepts of ‘important competitive force’ and ‘close competitors’ – Closeness of competition between the merging parties – Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index – Requests for information – Distortion.#Case C-581/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0582: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2024.#Die Länderbahn GmbH DLB and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Access to railway infrastructure – Charges – Article 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Powers – Review of the infrastructure charges whose period of application has expired – Power to declare invalidity with effect ex tunc and to order the reimbursement of charges.#Case C-582/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0582_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2024.#Die Länderbahn GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Access to railway infrastructure – Charges – Article 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Powers – Review of the infrastructure charges whose period of application has expired – Power to declare invalidity with effect ex tunc and to order the reimbursement of charges.#Case C-582/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0583:           Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 12 janvier 2023.#MV contre Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération policière et judiciaire en matière pénale – Décision-cadre 2008/675/JAI – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Principe de l’assimilation des condamnations antérieures prononcées dans un autre État membre – Obligation de reconnaître à ces condamnations des effets équivalents à ceux attachés aux condamnations nationales antérieures – Règles nationales relatives à la confusion des peines a posteriori – Pluralité d’infractions – Détermination d’une peine globale – Plafond de quinze ans pour les peines privatives de liberté de durée déterminée – Article 3, paragraphe 5 – Exception – Infra

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0583_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against MW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(1) – Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State – Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions – National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence – Multiple offences – Determination of an aggregate sentence – Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences – Article 3(5) – Exception – Offe

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0584: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked services – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) – Right of a traveller to terminate a package travel contract without paying a termination fee – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – Spread of COVID-19 – Consequences significantly affecting the performance of the package or the carriage of passengers to the destination – Foreseeability of the occurrence of those consequences at the date of the declaration of termination – Events occurring after the termination date but before the start of the package.#Case C-584/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0584_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked services – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) – Right of a traveller to terminate a package travel contract without paying a termination fee – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – Spread of COVID-19 – Consequences significantly affecting the performance of the package or the carriage of passengers to the destination – Foreseeability of the occurrence of those consequences at the date of the declaration of termination – Events occurring after the termination date but before the start of the package.#Case C-584/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0585:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#X BV contre Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Liberté d’établissement – Article 49 TFUE – Impôt sur les sociétés – Emprunt transfrontalier intragroupe aux fins du financement de l’acquisition ou de l’augmentation d’une participation dans une société non liée au groupe concerné qui devient, à la suite de cette opération, liée à ce groupe – Déduction des intérêts versés au titre de cet emprunt – Emprunt contracté à des conditions de pleine concurrence – Notion de “montage purement artificiel” – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-585/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0585_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#X BV contre Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Liberté d’établissement – Article 49 TFUE – Impôt sur les sociétés – Emprunt transfrontalier intragroupe aux fins du financement de l’acquisition ou de l’augmentation d’une participation dans une société non liée au groupe concerné qui devient, à la suite de cette opération, liée à ce groupe – Déduction des intérêts versés au titre de cet emprunt – Emprunt contracté à des conditions de pleine concurrence – Notion de “montage purement artificiel” – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-585/22.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First15371538153915401542154415451546Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top