Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0087_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#TT v AK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 10 and 15 – Transfer to a court of another Member State better placed to hear the case – Conditions – Court of the Member State to which the child has been wrongfully removed – The 1980 Hague Convention – Best interests of the child.#Case C-87/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0090: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#“Gjensidige” ADB v „Rhenus Logistics“ UAB and „ACC Distribution“ UAB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 45 – Refusal to recognise a judgment – Article 71 – Relationship between that regulation and conventions governing particular matters – Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) – Article 31(3) – Lis pendens – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Concept of ‘public policy’.#Case C-90/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0090_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#“Gjensidige” ADB v „Rhenus Logistics“ UAB and „ACC Distribution“ UAB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 45 – Refusal to recognise a judgment – Article 71 – Relationship between that regulation and conventions governing particular matters – Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) – Article 31(3) – Lis pendens – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Concept of ‘public policy’.#Case C-90/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0096:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 21. Dezember 2023.#CDIL ̶ Companhia de Distribuição Integral Logística Portugal, S.A. gegen Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Freier Warenverkehr – Art. 34 AEUV – Mengenmäßige Einfuhrbeschränkungen – Maßnahmen gleicher Wirkung – Nationale Regelung, die die Zigarettenmengen, die in einem bestimmten Zeitraum in den steuerrechtlich freien Verkehr überführt werden dürfen, auf eine Höchstmenge beschränkt, die dem monatlichen Durchschnitt der in den vorangegangenen zwölf Monaten in den steuerrechtlich freien Verkehr überführten Mengen entspricht – Art. 36 AEUV – Rechtfertigung – Bekämpfung von Steuerhinterziehung und missbräuchlichen Verhaltensweisen – Schutz der öffentlichen Gesundheit – S

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0097: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#DC v HJ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 14(4)(a)(i) and (5) – Right of withdrawal for off-premises contracts – Information requirements for the trader concerned – Failure of that trader to inform the consumer – Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal – Withdrawal after the performance of the contract – Consequences.#Case C-97/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0097_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#DC v HJ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Essen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 14(4)(a)(i) and (5) – Right of withdrawal for off-premises contracts – Information requirements for the trader concerned – Failure of that trader to inform the consumer – Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal – Withdrawal after the performance of the contract – Consequences.#Case C-97/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0098:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 22 décembre 2022.#Eurelec Trading SCRL contre Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 1er, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “matière civile et commerciale” – Action d’une autorité publique visant à faire constater, sanctionner et cesser des pratiques restrictives de concurrence.#Affaire C-98/22.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First15261527152815291531153315341535Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top