maj 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0115: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2024.#SO v Nationale Anti-Doping Agentur Austria GmbH (NADA) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – National arbitration committee competent to combat doping in sport – Criteria – Independence of the body making the reference – Principle of effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-115/22.
maj 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0115_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2024.#SO v Nationale Anti-Doping Agentur Austria GmbH (NADA) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – National arbitration committee competent to combat doping in sport – Criteria – Independence of the body making the reference – Principle of effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-115/22.
september 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0116: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 4(4) and Article 6(1) – Failure to designate special areas of conservation – Failure to determine conservation objectives – Absence or insufficiency of conservation measures – Administrative practice.#Case C-116/22.
januar 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0118: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia „Natsionalna politsia“ pri MVR - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data for the purpose of combating crime – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Data minimisation – Limitation of storage – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage – Article 10 – Processing of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 16(2) and (3) – Right to erasure – Restriction of processing – Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Natural person convicted by final judgment and subsequently legally rehabilita
junij 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0118_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti – Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data for the purpose of combating crime – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Data minimisation – Limitation of storage – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage – Article 10 – Processing of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 16(2) and (3) – Right to erasure – Restriction of processing – Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Ri
december 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0119: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Teva BV and Teva Finland Oy v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, anciennement Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for obtaining an SPC for medicinal products – Article 3(a) – Concept of ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ – Article 3(c) – Concept of ‘product the subject of an SPC’ – Criteria for assessment.#Case C-119/22.
avgust 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0119_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Teva BV and Teva Finland Oy v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC v Clonmel Healthcare Limited.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus and the Supreme Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for obtaining an SPC for medicinal products – Article 3(a) – Concept of ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ – Article 3(c) – Concept of ‘product the subject of an SPC’ – Criteria for assessment.#Joined Cases C-119/22 and C-149/22.
januar 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0122: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Annulment – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion – Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion.#Case C-122/22 P.
junij 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0122_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Annulment – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion – Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion.#Case C-122/22 P.
junij 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0123: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directives 2008/115/EC, 2013/32/EU and 2013/33/EU – Procedure for granting international protection – Effective access – Border procedure – Procedural safeguards – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Appeals brought against administrative decisions rejecting an application for international protection – Right to remain in the territory – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Non-compliance – Article 260(2) TFEU – Financial penalties – Proportionality and dissuasiveness – Lump sum – Periodic penalty payment.#Case C-123/22.