Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CB0082: Case C-82/22 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Third paragraph of Article 9 — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

0 0

CELEX:62022CB0089: Case C-89/22: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Passengers friend GmbH v British Airways plc (Air transport — Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights — Connecting flight consisting of two legs — Significant delay to final destination on the second leg operated by a non-European airline — Compensation claim against the European airline that operated the first leg)

0 0

CELEX:62022CB0091: Case C-91/22, Edison Next: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Edison Next SpA, formerly Fenice — Qualità per l’ambiente SpA v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirements to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need fo

0 0

CELEX:62022CB0092: Case C-92/22, Edison Next: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Edison Next SpA, formerly Fenice — Qualità per l’ambiente SpA v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirements to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need fo

0 0

CELEX:62022CB0093: Case C-93/22, Edison Next: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Edison Next SpA, formerly Fenice — Qualità per l’ambiente SpA v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirements to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need fo

0 0

CELEX:62022CB0094: Case C-94/22, Gruppo Mauro Saviola: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Gruppo Mauro Saviola Srl v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirements to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court to the questions referred for a preli

0 0

CELEX:62022CB0095: Case C-95/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Târgu-Mureș — Romania) — proceedings brought by Delgaz Grid SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Article 82 TFEU — Right to information in criminal proceedings — Right of a person to be informed of the charges brought against him or her — Directive 2012/13/EU — Article 6(1) — Scope — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial protection — Challenge to the excessive length of criminal proceedings — National legislation allowing such a challenge to be made only by persons with the status of suspect or accused person — Article 267 TFEU — Article 53(2) of the

RSS
First14391440144114421444144614471448Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top