maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0378: Case C-378/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – British Airways v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Characterisation – Single and continuous infringement – Taking into account the effects of the single and
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0379: Case C-379/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the co
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0380: Case C-380/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement)
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0381: Case C-381/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Japan Airlines v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Requirement of substantiality – Requirement of immediacy – Single and continuous infringement)
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0382: Case C-382/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringeme
oktober 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0384: Case C-384/22: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 September 2023 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Protection of health — Directive 2013/59/Euratom — Basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation — Article 106 — Transposition — Failure to transpose or to communicate the measures taken within the prescribed time limit)
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0385: Case C-385/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects)
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0386: Case C-386/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Martinair Holland v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects)
november 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0387: Case C-387/22, Nord Vest Pro Sani Pro: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Satu Mare – Romania) – Nord Vest Pro Sani Pro SRL v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Satu Mare, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Construction sector – Posting of workers – Tax and social security advantages granted to employees and construction undertakings – Exemption from income tax – Exemption from health insurance contributions – Reduction in social security contributions – National legislation reserving the benefit of those advantages solely to construction services carried out in national ter
marec 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CA0389: Case C-389/22, Croce Rossa Italiana and Others: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — GC and others v Croce Rossa Italiana, Ministero della Difesa, Ministero della Salute, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling — Exceptions to that obligation — Criteria — Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt — Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matte