Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0211: Case C-211/22, Super Bock Bebidas: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa — Portugal) — Super Bock Bebidas, SA, AN, BQ v Autoridade da Concorrência (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101 TFEU — Vertical agreements — Minimum resale prices fixed by a supplier to its distributors — Concept of ‘restriction of competition by object’ — Concept of ‘agreement’ — Proof of a concurrence of wills between the supplier and its distributors — Practice covering almost the entire territory of a Member State — Effect on trade between Member States — Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 and Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 — Hardcore restricti

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0213: Case C-213/22, Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas (Reforestation measures): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas, IP v CS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) — Community aid scheme for forestry measures in agriculture — Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 — Article 3, first paragraph, points (b) and (c) — Aid scheme — Maintenance premiums and premiums for loss of income — Conditions for granting — National legislation laying down a requirement of a minimum reforestation density of the plots —

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0216: Case C-216/22, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Admissibility of a subsequent application): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen — Germany) — A.A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(d) and Article 40(2) and (3) — Subsequent application — Conditions for rejecting such an application as inadmissible — Concept of ‘new elements or findings’ — Judgment of the Court on a question of interpretation of EU law — Article 46 — Right to an effective remedy — Jurisdiction of the national court or tribunal to rule on such an application on the merits in the

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0218: Case C-218/22, Comune di Copertino: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Lecce — Italy) — BU v Comune di Copertino (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Allowance in lieu of days of leave not taken at the end of the employment relationship — National legislation prohibiting payment of that allowance in the event of the voluntary resignation of a public servant — Control of public expenditure — Organisational needs of the public employer)

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0219: Case C-219/22, QS (Revocation of suspension): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nesebar — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against QS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Taking account of convictions in the Member States in the course of new criminal proceedings — Article 1(1) — Scope — Article 3(1), (3) and (4) — Obligation to recognise the effects of previous convictions handed down in other Member States as equivalent to those attached to national convictions — Conditions — Imposition of a custodial sentence accompanied by a probationary suspension — New offence committed du

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0221: Case C-221/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 June 2024 – European Commission v Deutsche Telekom AG (Appeal – Competition – Articles 266 and 340 TFEU – Judgment reducing the amount of a fine imposed by the European Commission – Repayment by the Commission of the amount unduly collected – Obligation to pay interest – Characterisation – Compensation at a standard rate for loss of enjoyment of the unduly paid amount of the fine – Rate applicable)

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0222: Case C-222/22, Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (Subsequent religious conversion): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v JF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — Directive 2011/95/EU — Standards for the qualification as beneficiaries of international protection — Content of that protection — Article 5 — International protection needs arising sur place — Subsequent application for recognition of refugee status — Article 5(3) — Concept of ‘circumstances which the applicant has created by his or her own decision since leaving the country of origin’ — Abusive intent and abuse of the

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0224: Case C-224/22: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) 2022/110 — Annex III(c) — Fixing the maximum authorised fishing effort of European hake and red mullet for demersal longliners — Annex III(e) — Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp — Geographical subareas (GSAs) 1-2-5-6-7 — Article 43(2) and (3) TFEU — Regulation (EU) 2019/1022 — Fishing effort regime — Supplementary measures — Article 7(5) — Concept of ‘significant catches’ — Scientific advice — Article 7(3)(b) — Concept of a ‘conservation measure’ — Obligation to state reasons — Discretion — Limits — Principle of proportionality)

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0225: Case C-225/22, AW T: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Krakowie – Poland) – R S.A. v AW T sp. z o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of judges – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – National legislation and case-law prohibiting national courts from calling into question the legitimacy of constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges of those courts or bodies – Verification, by a lower court, of compliance by a higher court with requirements relating to the guarantee of an independent and impartial tribunal previously estab

RSS
First14091410141114121414141614171418Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top