Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0688:           Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 25 octobre 2023.#BNP Paribas Public Sector SA contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Clause compromissoire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Contrats concernant l’engagement de paiement irrévocable et le dispositif de garantie – Rejet de la demande de restitution des garanties liées aux contributions ex ante fournies sous la forme d’engagements de paiement irrévocables – Établissement dont l’agrément a été retiré – Article 7, paragraphe 3, du règlement d’exécution (UE) 2015/81 – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Enrichissement sans cause.#Affaire T-688/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0688_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#BNP Paribas Public Sector SA v Single Resolution Board.#Arbitration clause – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Contracts concerning the irrevocable payment commitment and the collateral arrangements – Rejection of the request for return of collateral linked to ex ante contributions provided in the form of irrevocable payment commitments – Institution whose authorisation has been withdrawn – Article 7(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Non-contractual liability – Unjust enrichment.#Case T-688/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0689: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 July 2024.#Margrete Auken and Others v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Advance purchase agreements and purchase agreements concluded between the Commission and pharmaceutical companies for the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Obligation to state reasons – Existence of a foreseeable and not purely hypothetical risk of the interest relied on being undermined – Principle of good administration – Freedom of expression.#Case T-689/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0689_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 July 2024.#Margrete Auken and Others v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Advance purchase agreements and purchase agreements concluded between the Commission and pharmaceutical companies for the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Obligation to state reasons – Existence of a foreseeable and not purely hypothetical risk of the interest relied on being undermined – Principle of good administration – Freedom of expression.#Case T-689/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0698: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 June 2024.#Georgios Paraskevaidis v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Family allowances – Education allowance – Refusal to grant – Article 3(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Vocational training – Higher education – Delegation of powers – Recall of the delegated powers – Competent appointing authority.#Case T-698/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0698_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 June 2024.#Georgios Paraskevaidis v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Family allowances – Education allowance – Refusal to grant – Article 3(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Vocational training – Higher education – Delegation of powers – Recall of the delegated powers – Competent appointing authority.#Case T-698/21.

RSS
First13551356135713581360136213631364Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top