september 26, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0483_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne S.A. v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Common methodology for regional coordination of operational security – Rejection of the proposal of the system operators – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Compatibility with Regulation (EU) 2019/942, Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Regulation (EU) 2017/1485.#Case T-483/21.
oktober 24, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0484: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne S.A. v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-484/21.
februar 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0484_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne S.A. v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-484/21.
september 26, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0485: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (BNetzA) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-485/21.
september 26, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0485_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (BNetzA) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-485/21.
september 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0486: Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 7 septembre 2022.#OE contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Télétravail – Demande de remboursement de frais de téléphone et de connexion à Internet – Rejet de la demande – Exception d’illégalité – Recevabilité partielle – Article 71 et annexe VII du statut – Devoir de sollicitude – Principe d’égalité et de non-discrimination – Droit au respect de la vie privée.#Affaire T-486/21. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0486_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#OE v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Teleworking – Claim for reimbursement of telephone and internet connection expenses – Claim rejected – Plea of illegality – Partial admissibility – Article 71 of and Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of equality and non-discrimination – Right to respect for private life.#Case T-486/21.
december 18, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0487(01): Urteil des Gerichts (Zweite erweiterte Kammer) vom 17. Dezember 2025.#Neoperl AG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsmarke, die ein zylindrisches sanitäres Einsetzteil darstellt – Positions-Tastmarke – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Fehlende Unterscheidungskraft – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 207/2009 – Begründungspflicht – Art. 94 Abs. 1 der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Ermittlung des Sachverhalts von Amts wegen – Art. 95 der Verordnung 2017/1001.#Rechtssache T-487/21 RENV. This document does not exist in English.
januar 21, 2026 0 3 CELEX:62021TJ0487(01)_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2025.#Neoperl AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-487/21 RENV.
december 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0487: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre élargie) du 7 décembre 2022.#Neoperl AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne représentant un insert sanitaire cylindrique – Marque de position tactile – Motifs absolus de refus – Champ d’application de la loi – Relevé d’office – Examen par la chambre de recours du caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement no 207/2009 [devenu article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement 2017/1001] – Signe non susceptible de constituer une marque de l’Union européenne – Absence d’une représentation graphique précise et complète en elle-même de l’impression tactile produite par le signe – Article 4 et article 7, p This document does not exist in English.