oktober 11, 2023 0 65 CELEX:62021CO0757: Rectification order of 3 October 2023.#Nichicon Corporation v European Commission.#Rectification of judgment.#Case C-757/21 P.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0761: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.
maj 11, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0761_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0762: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.
maj 11, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0762_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.
maj 30, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0764: Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Zehnte Kammer) vom 19. Mai 2022.#TUIfly GmbH gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtsmittel – Art. 181 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Zugang zu Dokumenten – Dokumente eines Verfahrens zur Kontrolle staatlicher Beihilfen – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1049/2001 – Art. 4 Abs. 2 a. E. – Ausnahmen vom Zugangsrecht – Überwiegendes öffentliches Interesse – Begriff – Grundsatz der guten Verwaltung – Art. 41 Abs. 2 Buchst. b der Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Verteidigungsrechte – Spezifische Ziele des Verfahrens zur Kontrolle staatlicher Beihilfen – Verweigerung des Zugangs – Teils offensichtlich unzulässiges und teils offensichtlich unbegründetes Rechtsmittel.#Rechtssache C-764/21 P. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 11, 2022 0 188 CELEX:62021CO0764_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#TUIfly GmbH v European Commission.#Case C-764/21 P.
maj 01, 2024 0 30 CELEX:62021CO0766: Ordonnance de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 20 mars 2024.#Parlement européen contre Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA e.a.#Réouverture de la phase orale de la procédure – Tenue d’une audience.#Affaire C-766/21 P. This document does not exist in English.
maj 28, 2024 0 38 CELEX:62021CO0766_INF: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Case C-766/21 P.
november 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0773: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 16 novembre 2023.#AV et AW contre Parlement européen.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Procédure disciplinaire – Sanction disciplinaire – Rétrogradation – Enquête de l’Office européen de lutte antifraude (OLAF) – Procédure pénale nationale parallèle – Mandat de l’avocat – Proportionnalité de la sanction disciplinaire – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Pourvoi, en partie, manifestement irrecevable et, en partie, manifestement non fondé.#Affaire C-773/21 P. This document does not exist in English.