januar 30, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0780: Case T-780/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark LiLAC — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
oktober 30, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0786: Case T-786/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Team Beverage v EUIPO (TEAM BUSINESS IT DATEN — PROZESSE — SYSTEME) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark TEAM BUSINESS IT DATEN — PROZESSE — SYSTEME — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
marec 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0787: Case T-787/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — UniSkin v EUIPO — Unicskin (UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild — Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
junij 19, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0794: Case T-794/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2023 — Wenz Kunststoff v EUIPO — Mouldpro (MOULDPRO) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark MOULDPRO — Genuine use of the mark — Nature of use — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Legitimate expectations)
november 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0795: Case T-795/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Protectoplus v EUIPO (Li-SAFE) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Li-SAFE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application)
januar 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0796: Case T-796/21: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2022 — Grupo Eig Multimedia v EUIPO — Globalización de Valores CFC & GCI (FORO16) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FORO16 — Earlier EU figurative and word marks Cambio16, Energia16, Cambio16 radio — Earlier national figurative and word marks Camb16, DEFENSA Y SEGURIDAD 16, CAMBIO16 DIGITAL, EVENTOS 16, Salón16 — Relative ground for refusal — Family of marks — No evidence — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
februar 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0799: Case T-799/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2024 – European Food v EUIPO – Société des produits Nestlé (FITNESS) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FITNESS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
december 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0802: Case T-802/21: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2022 — just-organic.com v EUIPO (JUST ORGANIC) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark JUST ORGANIC — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
marec 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0805: Case T-805/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2023 — NS v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Reassignment — Interests of the service — Correspondence between the grade and the post — Loss of an allowance — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Misuse of powers and abuse of procedure)
januar 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0807: Case T-807/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2023 — QI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Refusal of request — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Prima facie evidence — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Right to be heard — Error of assessment — Liability)