november 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0476: Case T-476/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – TransnetBW v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)
julij 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0477: Case T-477/21: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2023 — Glaxo Group v EUIPO — Cipla Europe (Shape of an inhaler) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of an inhaler — Absolute ground for invalidity — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
september 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0478: Case T-478/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — Les Éditions P. Amaury v EUIPO — Golden Balls (BALLON D’OR) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark BALLON D’OR — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use — Assessment of the evidence — Classification of the services)
avgust 08, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0479: Case T-479/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Haswani v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Error of assessment — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair trial)
november 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0482: Case T-482/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – TenneT TSO and TenneT TSO v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Obligation to state reasons – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)
november 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0483: Case T-483/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Common methodology for regional coordination of operational security – Rejection of the proposal of the system operators – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Compatibility with Regulation (EU) 2019/942, Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Regulation (EU) 2017/1485)
november 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0484: Case T-484/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)
november 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0485: Case T-485/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – BNetzA v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)
oktober 31, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0486: Case T-486/21: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — OE v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Teleworking — Claim for reimbursement of telephone and Internet connection expenses — Claim rejected — Plea of illegality — Partial admissibility — Article 71 of and Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of equality and non-discrimination — Right to respect for private life)
februar 16, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0487(01): Case T-487/21 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2025 – Neoperl v EUIPO (Representation of a cylindrical sanitary insert) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU trade mark representing a cylindrical sanitary insert – Tactile position mark – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001)