Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0524: Case T-524/21: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2022 — Saure v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission correspondence with AstraZeneca and the German authorities concerning the quantity of COVID-19 vaccines and their delivery times — Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings — Documents having been produced in the context of court proceedings that were closed at the time of adoption of the decision refusing access to those documents — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests of a third party)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0526: Case T-526/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Gutseriev v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus — Freezing of funds — Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States — Inclusion and retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Error of assessment — Right to property — Right to conduct a business — Right to respect for reputation — Rights of the defence)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0528: Case T-528/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2023 — Neratax v EUIPO — Intrum Hellas and Others (ELLO ERMOL, Ello creamy, ELLO, MORFAT Creamy and MORFAT) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word marks ELLO and MORFAT and EU figurative marks ELLO ERMOL, Ello creamy and MORFAT Creamy — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0530: Case T-530/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Pierre Lannier v EUIPO — Pierre Lang Trading (PL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a mirror image combination of the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ — Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Locus standi — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0532: Case T-532/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2023 — MAZ — upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus — Freezing of funds — Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists — Concept of ‘support for the regime’ — State-owned enterprise — Error of assessment)

RSS
First12501251125212531255125712581259Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top