Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0315: Case T-315/21: Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Nordesta (APIAL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark APIAL — Earlier EU word mark APIRETAL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0324: Case T-324/21: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2023 — Harley-Davidson Europe and Neovia Logistics Services International v Commission (Customs union — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Determination of the non-preferential origin of certain motorcycles manufactured by Harley-Davidson — Commission Implementing Decision requesting the revocation of decisions relating to binding origin information adopted by the national customs authorities — Concept of ‘processing or working operations which are not economically justified’ — Right to be heard)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0326: Case T-326/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission (Dumping — Import of aluminium extrusions originating in China — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 — Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Definition of the product concerned — Determination of the normal value — Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Report establishing significant distortions in the exporting country — Burden of proof — Reference to a representative country — Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Injury — Economic factors and incices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry — Rights of the defence — Principle

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0332: Case T-332/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2023 — Wizz Air Hungary v Commission (TAROM; COVID-19) (State aid — Romanian air transport market — Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — State guarantee on loans — Decision not to raise any objections — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question — Admissibility — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Assessment of the damage — Causal link — Beneficiary’s pre-existing difficulties — Principle of non-discrimination — Freedom to provide services — Freedom of establishment — Obligation to state reasons)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0333: Case T-333/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2023 — Ryanair v Commission (Alitalia II; COVID-19) (State aid — Italian air transport market — Aid granted by Italy to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — Direct grant — Decision not to raise any objections — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Article 107(2)(b) TFEU — Consideration of earlier aid measures in favour of the same beneficiary which are the subject of pending formal investigations — Assessment of damages — Causal link — Principle of non-discrimination — Free provision of services — Freedom of establishment — Obligation to state reasons)

RSS
First12281229123012311233123512361237Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top