marec 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0674: Ordonnance de la Cour du 22 février 2022.#Residencial Palladium, SL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-674/21 P. This document does not exist in English.
april 04, 2022 0 197 CELEX:62021CO0674_INF: Order of the Court of 22 February 2022.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-674/21 P.
marec 04, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0678: Order of the Court of 24 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/21 P.
junij 21, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0678_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/21 P.
marec 01, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0679: Order of the Court of 22 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-679/21 P.
april 04, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0679_INF: Order of the Court of 22 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-679/21 P.
maj 24, 2022 0 3 CELEX:62021CO0692: Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 17 mai 2022.#OH contre Cour européenne des droits de l'homme.#Pourvoi – Demande d’aide juridictionnelle – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Décision du Tribunal de l’Union européenne non susceptible de recours – Incompétence manifeste.#Affaire C-692/21 P. This document does not exist in English.
junij 15, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0692_INF: Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 17 mai 2022.#OH contre Cour européenne des droits de l'homme.#Pourvoi – Demande d’aide juridictionnelle – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Décision du Tribunal de l’Union européenne non susceptible de recours – Incompétence manifeste.#Affaire C-692/21 P. This document does not exist in English.
april 06, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0703: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 March 2022.#Giovanna Paola Girardi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Interim measures – Representation – No capacity to act as a representative before the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-703/21 P(R).