julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0765: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#D. M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals – Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Medicinal products for human use – Vaccines against COVID-19 – Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 – Validity of conditional marketing authorisations – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons – Inadmissibility.#Case C-765/21.
marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0765_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#D. M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Padova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals – Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Medicinal products for human use – Vaccines against COVID-19 – Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 – Validity of conditional marketing authorisations – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons – Inadmissibility.#Case C-765/21.
januar 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0766: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal br
avgust 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0766_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appea
december 15, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0767: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2023.#Jérôme Rivière and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Members of the European Parliament – Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament – Standards of conduct – Rule 10(3) – Prohibition on displaying banners during the sittings of Parliament – Oral measure of the President of the Parliament prohibiting MEPs from displaying national flags on their lecterns – Action for annulment – Article 263 TFEU – Concept of ‘challengeable act’.#Case C-767/21 P.
september 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0768: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21.
september 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0768_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21.
december 08, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0769: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#AAS „BTA Baltic Insurance Company” v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and Tieslietu ministrija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 18(1) – Principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality – Decision to withdraw an invitation to tender – Tenders submitted separately by two tenderers belonging to the same economic operator and constituting the two most economically advantageous tenders – Refusal of the successful tenderer to sign the contract – Decision of the contracting authority to refuse the tender of the next tenderer, terminate the procedure and issue a new call for tenders.#Case C-769/21.
september 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0770: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#„OGL-Food Trade Lebensmittelvertrieb“ GmbH v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia „Mitnitsa Plovdiv“ pri Agentsia „Mitnitsi“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Articles 70 and 74 – Determination of the customs value – Customs value of fruit and vegetables to which an entry price applies – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 181 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 – Article 75(5) and (6) – Declared transaction value higher than the standard import value – Disposal of products under conditions confirming the correctness of the transaction value – Sale by the importer at a loss – Relationship between the importer and the exporter – Judicial rev
april 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0772: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#UAB „Brink's Lithuania“ v Lietuvos bankas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the euro against counterfeiting – Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 – Article 6(1) – Payment service providers engaged in the processing of banknotes and their distribution to the public – Decision ECB/2010/14 – Article 6(2) – Detection of unfit euro banknotes – Automated fitness checking of banknotes – Minimum standards published on the website of the European Central Bank (ECB) and amended from time to time – Personal scope – Extent of cash handlers’ obligations – Binding force – Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-772/21.