avgust 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0100_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 March 2023.#QB v Mercedes-Benz Group AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Approval of motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Article 18(1) – Article 26(1) – Article 46 – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Exhaust gas recirculation valve (EGR valve) – Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Protection of the interests of an individual purchaser of a vehicle equipped with an unlawful defeat device – Right to compensation from the vehicle manufacturer on the basis of tortious liability – Method of calculating compe
maj 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0101: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#HJ v Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/94/EC – Protection of employees in the event of their employer’s insolvency – Article 2(2) – Concept of ‘employee’ – Article 12(a) and (c) – Limitations on the responsibility of the guarantee institutions – Person exercising, on the basis of a contract of employment entered into with a trading company, the functions of a management board member and chief executive officer of that company – Concurrent exercise of functions – National case-law refusing that person the benefit of the guarantees laid down by that directive.#Case C-101/21.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0101_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#HJ v Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/94/EC – Protection of employees in the event of their employer’s insolvency – Article 2(2) – Concept of ‘employee’ – Article 12(a) and (c) – Limitations on the responsibility of the guarantee institutions – Person exercising, on the basis of a contract of employment entered into with a trading company, the functions of a management board member and chief executive officer of that company – Concurrent exercise of functions – National case-law refusing that person the benefit of the guarantees laid down by that directive.#Case C-101/21.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0102: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#KW and SG v Autonome Provinz Bozen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aid granted by Member States – Aid scheme for the construction of mini-hydroelectric power plants – Alpine and mountain huts without connection to an electricity grid – Authorisation by the European Commission – Expiry.#Joined Cases C-102/21 and C-103/21.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0102_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#KW and SG v Autonome Provinz Bozen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aid granted by Member States – Aid scheme for the construction of mini-hydroelectric power plants – Alpine and mountain huts without connection to an electricity grid – Authorisation by the European Commission – Expiry.#Joined Cases C-102/21 and C-103/21.
junij 30, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0105: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#IR v Spetsializirana prokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 6 and 47 – Right to freedom of movement and residence – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Principles of equality and mutual trust – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Letter of Rights on arrest – Right of a person to be informed of the accusation against him or her in relation to a national arrest warrant – Right of access to the materials of the case – Conditions for issuing a European arrest warrant in respect of an accused person who is in the executing Member State
julij 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0110: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of non-privileged parties in a direct action before the Courts of the European Union – University teacher – University teacher teaching at the university represented in that action and performing duties as coordinator and head of the project that is the subject matter of the dispute – Condition of independence – Existence of a direct and personal interest in the outcome of the dispute.#Case C-110/21 P.
avgust 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0110_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of non-privileged parties in a direct action before the Courts of the European Union – University teacher – University teacher teaching at the university represented in that action and performing duties as coordinator and head of the project that is the subject matter of the dispute – Condition of independence – Existence of a direct and personal interest in the outcome of the dispute.#Case C-110/21 P.
oktober 20, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0111: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#BT v Laudamotion GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 17(1) – Liability of air carriers for death or bodily injuries sustained by passengers – Concept of ‘bodily injury’ – Post-traumatic stress disorder suffered by a passenger during the emergency evacuation of an aircraft.#Case C-111/21.
junij 02, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0112: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#X BV v Classic Coach Company vof and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 5 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Article 6(2) – Limitation of the effects of the trade mark – Impossibility for the proprietor of a trade mark to prevent a third party from using, in the course of trade, an earlier right applying in a particular locality – Requirements – Concept of ‘earlier right’ – Trade name – Proprietor of a later trade mark with an even earlier right – Relevance.#Case C-112/21.