januar 12, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0356: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#J.K. v TP S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 3(1)(a) and (c) – Conditions for access to self-employment – Employment and working conditions – Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation – Self-employed person working on the basis of a contract for specific work – Termination and non-renewal of contract – Freedom to choose a contracting party.#Case C-356/21.
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0356_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#J.K. v TP S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 3(1)(a) and (c) – Conditions for access to self-employment – Employment and working conditions – Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation – Self-employed person working on the basis of a contract for specific work – Termination and non-renewal of contract – Freedom to choose a contracting party.#Case C-356/21.
november 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0358: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 November 2022.#Tilman SA v Unilever Supply Chain Company AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Lugano II Convention – Jurisdiction clause – Formal requirements – Clause included in the general terms and conditions – General terms and conditions which may be viewed and printed from a hypertext link mentioned in a contract concluded in writing – Consent of the parties.#Case C-358/21.
oktober 20, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0362: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zehnte Kammer) vom 20. Oktober 2022.#EKOFRUKT gegen Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ – Veliko Tarnovo.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Binnenmarkt – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 910/2014 – Art. 3 Nr. 12 – Begriff ‚Qualifizierte elektronische Signatur‘ – Art. 25 Abs. 1 – Art. 26 – Anhang I – Rechtswirkung elektronischer Signaturen – Anforderungen an eine fortgeschrittene elektronische Signatur – Verwaltungsakt in Form eines elektronischen Dokuments, dessen elektronische Signatur nicht die Anforderungen einer ‚qualifizierten elektronischen Signatur‘ erfüllt – Kumulative Anforderungen – Folgen – Art. 3 Nr. 15 – Nichtvorliegen eines ‚qualifizierten Zertifikats für elektronische Signaturen‘ – Eintragung einer quali This document does not exist in English.
julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0363: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#Ferrovienord SpA and Federazione Italiana Triathlon v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#References for a preliminary ruling – Second paragraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Economic policy – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union (ESA) – Directive 2011/85/EU – Requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States – National legislation limiting the jurisdiction of the audit court – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of t
marec 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0365: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 March 2023.#MR v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bamberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 55(1)(b) – Exception to the application of the principle ne bis in idem – Offence against the security or other essential interests of the Member State – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the principle ne bis in idem – Compatibility of a national declaration providing for an exception to the principle ne bis in idem – Criminal organisation – Financial crime.#Case C-365/21.
avgust 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0365_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 March 2023.#Criminal proceedings against MR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Bamberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 55(1)(b) – Exception to the application of the principle ne bis in idem – Offence against the security or other essential interests of the Member State – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the principle ne bis in idem – Compatibility of a national declaration providing for an exception to the principle ne bis in idem – Criminal organisation – Fi
december 15, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0366: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#Maxime Picard v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – 2014 reform – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 – Annex XIII to those regulations – Second paragraph of Article 21 and second subparagraph of Article 22(1) – Transitional measures relating to the annual rate of accrual of pension rights and retirement age – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Annex – Article 1(1) – Application of those transitional measures by analogy to other staff employed on 31 December 2013 – Signature of new contract as a member of the contract staff – Act adversely affecting an official – Effective
maj 23, 2024 0 16 CELEX:62021CJ0367_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 January 2024.#Hewlett Packard Development Company LP v Senetic Spółka Akcyjna.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Case C-367/21.
september 08, 2022 0 3 CELEX:62021CJ0368: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#R.T. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Place where the customs debt is incurred – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30 – Article 60 – Article 71(1) – Chargeable event and place where the import VAT becomes chargeable – Place where the tax liability is incurred – Finding of a failure to comply with an obligation imposed by EU customs legislation – Determination of the place of importation of goods – Means of transport registered in a third country and imported into the European Union in infringement of customs legislation.#Case C-368/21.