Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0243:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 17. November 2022.#„TOYA“ sp. z o.o. und Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji gegen Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Telekommunikation – Richtlinie 2002/19/EG (Zugangsrichtlinie) – Art. 8 Abs. 3 – Richtlinie 2014/61/EU – Art. 1 Abs. 3 und 4 und Art. 3 Abs. 5 – Befugnis der nationalen Regulierungsbehörde, regulatorische Vorabverpflichtungen für den Zugang zur physischen Infrastruktur eines Netzbetreibers ohne beträchtliche Marktmacht aufzuerlegen – Fehlen eines Rechtsstreits über den Zugang.#Rechtssache C-243/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0245: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland vertreten durch Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat v MA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Articles 27 and 29 – Transfer of the person concerned to the Member State responsible for the examination of his or her request – Suspension of the transfer due to the COVID-19 pandemic – Impossibility of carrying out the transfer – Judicial protection – Consequences for the time limit for transfer.#Joined Cases C-245/21 and C-248/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0245_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v MA and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Articles 27 and 29 – Transfer of the person concerned to the Member State responsible for the examination of his or her request – Suspension of the transfer due to the COVID-19 pandemic – Impossibility of carrying out the transfer – Judicial protection – Consequences for the time limit for transfer.#Joined Cases C-245/21 and C-248/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0246:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 22 décembre 2022.#Parlement européen contre Giulia Moi.#Pourvoi – Droit institutionnel – Membre du Parlement européen – Principe ne ultra petita – Objet du litige – Droits de la défense – Article 232 TFUE – Modalités de fonctionnement du Parlement – Article 263, sixième alinéa, TFUE – Délai de recours – Pourvoi incident.#Affaire C-246/21 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0247: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#Luxury Trust Automobil GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 42(a) – Article 197(1)(c) – Article 226(11a) – Article 141 – Exemption – Triangular transaction – Designation of the final recipient of a supply as being liable for VAT – Invoicing – Reference to ‘Reverse charge’ – Mandatory – Omission of that reference on an invoice – Retroactive correction of the invoice.#Case C-247/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0249: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Fuhrmann-2-GmbH v B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 8(2) – Distance contracts concluded by electronic means – Information requirements for the trader – Activation of a button or a similar function in order to place the order with an obligation to pay – Unambiguous formulation corresponding to the words ‘order with obligation to pay’ – Taking account only of the words on the button or similar function for the purposes of assessing the ‘corresponding’ nature of such a formulation.#Case C-249/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0249_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Fuhrmann-2-GmbH v B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 8(2) – Distance contracts concluded by electronic means – Information requirements for the trader – Activation of a button or a similar function in order to place the order with an obligation to pay – Unambiguous formulation corresponding to the words ‘order with obligation to pay’ – Taking account only of the words on the button or similar function for the purposes of assessing the ‘corresponding’ nature of such a formulation.#Case C-249/21.

RSS
First11071108110911101112111411151116Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top