november 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0163: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#AD v PACCAR Inc and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks in the European Economic Area (EEA) – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 22(2) – Applicability ratione temporis – First subparagraph of Article 5(1) – Concept of relevant evidence which lies in the control of the defendant or a third party – Article 5(2) – Disclosure of specified items of evidence or relevant categories of evidence on
avgust 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0163_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#AD v PACCAR Inc and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks in the European Economic Area (EEA) – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 22(2) – Applicability ratione temporis – First subparagraph of Article 5(1) – Concept of relevant evidence which lies in the control of the defendant or a third party – Article 5(2) – D
oktober 13, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0164: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#SIA „BALTIJAS STARPTAUTISKĀ AKADĒMIJA” v Latvijas Zinātnes padome.#References for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Article 2(83) – Direct and unconditional reference to EU law – Admissibility of the questions – Research and development and innovation aid – Concept of ‘research and knowledge-dissemination organisation’ – Higher education establishment carrying on economic and non-economic activities – Determination of the primary goal.#Case C-164/21.
november 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0166: Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 24 novembre 2022.#Commission européenne contre République de Pologne.#Manquement d’État – Droits d’accise sur l’alcool et les boissons alcooliques – Directive 92/83/CEE – Exonération de l’accise harmonisée – Alcool éthylique utilisé pour la fabrication de médicaments – Article 27, paragraphe 1, sous d) – Exonération conditionnée au placement de l’alcool sous un régime de suspension de droits – Impossibilité d’obtenir le remboursement de l’accise acquittée – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-166/21. This document does not exist in English.
februar 02, 2023 0 104 CELEX:62021CJ0166_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 November 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Case C-166/21.
julij 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0168: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 14 juillet 2022.#Procureur général près la cour d'appel d'Angers contre KL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Article 2, paragraphe 4 – Condition de la double incrimination du fait – Article 4, point 1 – Motif de non‑exécution facultative du mandat d’arrêt européen – Contrôle par l’autorité judiciaire d’exécution – Faits en partie constitutifs d’une infraction au regard du droit de l’État membre d’exécution – Article 49, paragraphe 3, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Principe de proportionnalité des délits et des peines.#Affaire C-168/21. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0168_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#KL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 2(4) – Condition of double criminality of the act – Article 4(1) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Verification by the executing judicial authority – Acts some of which constitute an offence under the law of the executing Member State – Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of proportionality of criminal offences and penalties.#Case C-168/21.
junij 30, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0170: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 30. Juni 2022.#Profi Credit Bulgaria gegen T.I.T.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Richtlinie 93/13/EWG – Verbraucherkredit – Missbräuchliche Klauseln in Verbraucherverträgen – Art. 6 Abs. 1 – Prüfung von Amts wegen – Weigerung, im Fall einer auf eine missbräuchliche Klausel gestützten Forderung einen Mahnbescheid zu erlassen – Konsequenzen in Bezug auf die Missbräuchlichkeit einer Vertragsklausel – Erstattungsanspruch – Grundsätze der Äquivalenz und der Effektivität – Verrechnung von Amts wegen.#Rechtssache C-170/21. This document does not exist in English.
marec 16, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0174: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Article 260(2) TFEU – Obligation to take the necessary measures to comply with such a judgment – Failure to fulfil that obligation alleged by the European Commission – Lack of clarity of the letter of formal notice as to whether the judgment still had to be complied with on the reference date – Principle of legal certainty – Inadmissibility.#Case C-174/21.
avgust 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0174_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Article 260(2) TFEU – Obligation to take the necessary measures to comply with such a judgment – Failure to fulfil that obligation alleged by the European Commission – Lack of clarity of the letter of formal notice as to whether the judgment still had to be complied with on the reference date – Principle of legal certainty – Inadmissibility.#Case C-174/21.