Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0137_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 September 2023.#European Parliament v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – Point (f) of the first paragraph of Article 7 – List of third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States – List of third countries whose nationals are exempt from that requirement – Principle of reciprocity – Request to adopt a delegated act temporarily suspending the visa exemption for a 12-month period for nationals of the United States of America.#Case C-137/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0144: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#European Parliament v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Implementing Decision C(2020) 8797 – Authorisation of certain uses of chromium trioxide – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals – Article 60 – Granting of authorisations – Obligation to demonstrate that socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health or the environment arising from the use of the substance and that there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies – Article 62 – Applications for authorisation – Article 64 – Procedure for authorisation decisions.#Case C-144/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0146: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti - Administraţia Sector 1 a Finanţelor Publice v VB and Direcţia Generalā Regionalā a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti -Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii 1.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Implementing Decisions 2010/583/EU and 2013/676/EU authorising Romania to derogate from Article 193 of that directive – Reverse charge mechanism – Supplies of wood products – National legislation imposing a condition of registration for VAT purposes for the application of that mechanism – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-146/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0147: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 January 2023.#Comité interprofessionnel des huiles essentielles françaises (CIHEF) and Others v Ministre de la Transition écologique and Premier ministre.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 72 – Free movement of goods – Article 34 TFEU – Possibility for Member States to adopt restrictive measures on commercial and advertising practices – Selling arrangements falling outside the scope of Article 34 TFEU – Whether justified – Article 36 TFEU – Objective of protecting human and animal health and the environment – Proportionality.#Case C-147/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0147_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 January 2023.#Comité interprofessionnel des huiles essentielles françaises (CIHEF) and Others v Ministre de la Transition écologique and Premier ministre.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 72 – Free movement of goods – Article 34 TFEU – Possibility for Member States to adopt restrictive measures on commercial and advertising practices – Selling arrangements falling outside the scope of Article 34 TFEU – Whether justified – Article 36 TFEU – Objective of protecting human and animal health and the environment – Proportionality.#Case C-147/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0148:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Große Kammer) vom 22. Dezember 2022.#Christian Louboutin gegen Amazon Europe Core Sàrl u.a.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Unionsmarke – Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Art. 9 Abs. 2 Buchst. a – Rechte aus der Unionsmarke – Begriff ‚Benutzung‘ – Betreiber einer Online-Verkaufsplattform mit integriertem Online-Marktplatz – Anzeigen, die auf diesem Marktplatz von Drittanbietern veröffentlicht werden, die in diesen Anzeigen ein mit einer fremden Marke identisches Zeichen für Waren benutzen, die mit denjenigen identisch sind, für die diese Marke eingetragen ist – Wahrnehmung dieses Zeichens als fester Bestandteil der kommerziellen Kommunikation dieses Betreibers – Präsentationsweise der Anzeigen, die es nicht ermöglicht, die Angebote des Betr

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0148_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Christian Louboutin v Amazon Europe Core Sàrl and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'arrondissement de Luxembourg and Tribunal de l’entreprise francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 9(2)(a) – Rights conferred by an EU trade mark – Concept of ‘use’ – Operator of an online sales website incorporating an online marketplace – Advertisements published on that marketplace by third-party sellers using, in those advertisements, a sign which is identical with a trade mark of another person for goods which are identical with those for which that trade mark is registered – Perception of that sign as forming an integral

RSS
First10971098109911001102110411051106Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top