junij 30, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0051: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#Aktsiaselts M.V.WOOL v Põllumajandus- ja Toiduamet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food law – Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 – Microbiological criteria for foodstuffs – Article 3(1) – Obligations of food business operators – Annex I – Point 1.2 of Chapter 1 – Limit values for the presence of Listeria monocytogenes in fish products before and after being placed on the market – Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 – Article 14(8) – Official controls of the product at the stage at which it is placed on the market – Scope.#Case C-51/21.
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0052: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Siebte Kammer) vom 24. Februar 2022.#Pharmacie populaire – La Sauvegarde SCRL gegen État belge.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Freier Dienstleistungsverkehr – Art. 56 AEUV – Beschränkungen – Steuerrecht – Körperschaftsteuer – Verpflichtung der Erwerber von Dienstleistungen, Belege über die von in einem anderen Mitgliedstaat ansässigen Dienstleistungserbringern in Rechnung gestellten Beträge auszustellen und an die Steuerverwaltung zu übermitteln – Keine solche Verpflichtung bei allein innerstaatlichen Dienstleistungen – Rechtfertigung – Wirksamkeit der Steuerkontrollen – Verhältnismäßigkeit.#Rechtssache C-52/21. This document does not exist in English.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0052_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Pharmacie populaire – La Sauvegarde SCRL v État belge and Pharma Santé – Réseau Solidaris SCRL v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFUE – Restrictions – Tax legislation – Corporation tax – Obligation for purchasers of services to draw up and submit supporting documents to the tax authorities concerning amounts invoiced by suppliers of services established in another Member State – No such obligation regarding purely domestic supplies of services – Justification – Effectiveness of fiscal supervision – Proportionality.#Joined Cases C-52/21 and C-53/21.
november 17, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0054: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Konsorcjum: ANTEA POLSKA S.A., „Pectore-Eco'' sp. z o.o., Instytut Ochrony Środowiska - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy v Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Principles of awarding contracts – Article 18 – Transparency – Article 21 – Confidentiality – Insertion of those principles in the national legislation – Right of access to the essential content of the information provided by tenderers concerning their experience and references, concerning the persons proposed to carry out the contract and concerning the design of the proposed projects and the manner of performance – Article 67 – Contract award criteria – Criteria relating t
avgust 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0054_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Antea Polsk S.A., 'Pectore-Eco'' sp. z o.o., Instytut Ochrony Środowiska - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy v Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Principles of awarding contracts – Article 18 – Transparency – Article 21 – Confidentiality – Insertion of those principles in the national legislation – Right of access to the essential content of the information provided by tenderers concerning their experience and references, concerning the persons proposed to carry out the contract and concerning the design of the proposed projects and the manner of performance –
junij 09, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0055: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Direktor na Agentsia „Mitnitsi“ v IMPERIAL TOBACCO BULGARIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 11 – Reimbursement of excise duty on excise goods released for consumption – Directive 2011/64/EU – point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 17 – Reimbursement of excise duty already paid, by means of tax markings, affixed to manufactured tobacco destroyed under administrative supervision – Obligation of Member States to adopt regulations providing for the reimbursement of excise duties on manufactured tobacco released for consumption and destroyed under customs supervision – None.#Case C-55/21.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0055_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Direktor na Agentsia „Mitnitsi“ v IMPERIAL TOBACCO BULGARIA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duty – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 11 – Repayment of excise duty on excise goods released for consumption – Directive 2011/64/EU – Article 17, first paragraph, point (b) – Repayment of excise duty already paid, by means of tax markings affixed to manufactured tobacco destroyed under administrative supervision – Obligation on Member States to adopt legislation providing for the reimbursement of excise duty on manufactured tobacco released for consumption and destroyed under customs supervision – None.#Case C-55/21.
junij 30, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0056: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#UAB „ARVI“ ir ko v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 137 – Optional tax liability scheme – Conditions – National legislation which makes the right of a taxable person to opt to charge VAT on the sale of immovable property conditional on the transfer of that property to a taxable person already registered for VAT purposes – Obligation to adjust VAT deductions where that condition is not satisfied – Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality.#Case C-56/21.
januar 12, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0057: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 12. Januar 2023.#RegioJet a. s. gegen České dráhy a.s. und Česká republika, Ministerstvo dopravy.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Wettbewerb – Missbrauch einer beherrschenden Stellung – Vorschriften für Schadensersatzklagen nach nationalem Recht wegen Zuwiderhandlungen gegen wettbewerbsrechtliche Bestimmungen der Mitgliedstaaten und der Europäischen Union – Richtlinie 2014/104/EU – Art. 5 und 6 – Offenlegung von Beweismitteln – Beweismittel in den Akten einer Wettbewerbsbehörde – Bei der Europäischen Kommission anhängiges Verfahren wegen einer Zuwiderhandlung gegen die Wettbewerbsregeln – Nationales Verfahren über eine Schadensersatzklage wegen derselben Zuwiderhandlung – Bedingungen für die Offenlegung von Beweismit This document does not exist in English.
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0057_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s. and.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Articles 5 and 6 – Disclosure of evidence – Evidence in a competition authority’s file – Proceedings relating to an infringement of competition rules pending before the European Commission – National proceedings relating to an action for damages with regard to the same infringement – Conditions for the disclosure of evidence.#Case C-57/21.