junij 29, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0306: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 June 2022.#Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark La Irlandesa 1943 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Declaration of invalidity by the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court – Relevant date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity – Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-306/20.
avgust 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0306_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 June 2022.#Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark La Irlandesa 1943 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Declaration of invalidity by the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court – Relevant date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity – Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-306/20.
maj 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0312: Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre élargie) du 17 mai 2023.#EVH GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Concurrence – Concentrations – Marché de l’électricité allemand – Décision déclarant la concentration compatible avec le marché intérieur – Recours en annulation – Qualité pour agir – Recevabilité – Obligation de motivation – Notion de “concentration unique” – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Droit d’être entendu – Délimitation du marché – Période d’analyse – Analyse du pouvoir de marché – Influence déterminante – Erreurs manifestes d’appréciation – Obligation de diligence.#Affaire T-312/20. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0312_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#EVH GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Locus Standi – Admissibility – Duty to state reasons – Concept of ‘single concentration’ – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to be heard – Definition of the market – Period of analysis – Analysis of market power – Decisive influence – Manifest errors of assessment – Duty of care.#Case T-312/20.
maj 18, 2023 0 96 CELEX:62020TJ0313: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-313/20.
avgust 28, 2023 0 86 CELEX:62020TJ0313_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-313/20.
maj 18, 2023 0 96 CELEX:62020TJ0314: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, anciennement GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-314/20.
avgust 28, 2023 0 134 CELEX:62020TJ0314_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, formerly GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-314/20.
maj 18, 2023 0 88 CELEX:62020TJ0315: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#TEAG Thüringer Energie AG v European Commission.#Case T-315/20.
avgust 28, 2023 0 72 CELEX:62020TJ0315_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#TEAG Thüringer Energie AG v European Commission.#Case T-315/20.