Related articles

• OJ:C_202604511: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the the District Court of Reykjavik dated 30 March 2026 in the case of Íslenska gámafélagið ehf. v Sorpa bs. (Case E-6/26)
• OJ:C_202604512: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 24 April 2026 in the case of Hemla Africa Holding AS & Others v Philia E&P Holding (Ireland) Limited (Case E-8/26)
• CELEX:62025CO0851_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P.
• CELEX:62025CO0883_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain.#Case C-883/25.
• CELEX:62025CO0502_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#„YETTEL BULGARIA“ EAD v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-502/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0518_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-518/24.
• CELEX:62025CO0850_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P.
• CELEX:32026D1947: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1947 of 21 April 2026 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Djibouti on the status of the European Union-led forces in the Republic of Djibouti in the framework of the European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES)
• CELEX:32009L0069R(01)
• CELEX:62025CO0582(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Single Judge), M. Biltgen François of 4 May 2026.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Interim relief – Appeal – Application for interim measures – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-582/25 P-R.
• CELEX:32026R0382R(04)
• CELEX:62025TA0424: Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – KJ and Others v Europol (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability)
• CELEX:62025TB0490: Case T-490/25: Order of the General Court of 24 June 2026 – Roja Parfums v EUIPO – Laurice El Badry Rahme (Bond No. 9 Manhattan)
• CELEX:62025TB0464: Case T-464/25: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – Tokareva v Council
• CELEX:62025TA0762: Case T-762/25: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – Phoenix Pharma v EUIPO (Be the Heartbeat of Healthcare) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Be the Heartbeat of Healthcare – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62026TB0108: Case T-108/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – QS v Commission (Application for interim measures – Public procurement – Exclusion from procurement and award procedures governed by Regulations (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 and (EU) 2018/1877 or from being selected to implement EU funds – Publication of information – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of interests)
• CELEX:62025TA0040: Case T-40/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – B.K.Licht (Lampshade) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
• CELEX:62024TA0538: Case T-538/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – Ryanair v Commission (Italy; amended aid scheme; COVID-19) (State aid – Italian air transport market – Extension and amendment of a compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons)
• CELEX:62025TA0100: Cases T-100/25, T-102/25 and T-103/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Testa and Others v EPPO (Civil Service – European Delegated Prosecutor – Remuneration – Allowance provided for under national law for prosecutors temporarily assigned to a public prosecutor’s office other than their office of origin – Request for an additional top-up allowance – Refusal of the request – Liability)
• CELEX:62025TA0615: Case T-615/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Veikkaus v EUIPO (FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Element of the mark having distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)