Related articles

• CELEX:62025TA0424: Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – KJ and Others v Europol (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability)
• CELEX:62025TB0464: Case T-464/25: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – Tokareva v Council
• CELEX:62025TA0762: Case T-762/25: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – Phoenix Pharma v EUIPO (Be the Heartbeat of Healthcare) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Be the Heartbeat of Healthcare – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62026TB0108: Case T-108/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – QS v Commission (Application for interim measures – Public procurement – Exclusion from procurement and award procedures governed by Regulations (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 and (EU) 2018/1877 or from being selected to implement EU funds – Publication of information – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of interests)
• CELEX:62025TA0040: Case T-40/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – B.K.Licht (Lampshade) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
• CELEX:62024TA0538: Case T-538/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – Ryanair v Commission (Italy; amended aid scheme; COVID-19) (State aid – Italian air transport market – Extension and amendment of a compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons)
• CELEX:62025TA0100: Cases T-100/25, T-102/25 and T-103/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Testa and Others v EPPO (Civil Service – European Delegated Prosecutor – Remuneration – Allowance provided for under national law for prosecutors temporarily assigned to a public prosecutor’s office other than their office of origin – Request for an additional top-up allowance – Refusal of the request – Liability)
• CELEX:62025TA0615: Case T-615/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Veikkaus v EUIPO (FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Element of the mark having distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62024TA0105: Case T-105/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Airbus Defence and Space and Marlink Events v EDA (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation)
• CELEX:62025TA0041: Case T-41/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – Light Tec (String of lights) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a string of lights – Grounds for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
• CELEX:62024TA0493: Case T-493/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety v EUBAM Libya (Public service contracts – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Private security services – Decision not to include the applicant among the pre-selected operators – Point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 and point 39.2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination)
• CELEX:62025TA0309: Case T-309/25: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – SCM Biogroup v EUIPO – Bio Group Medical System (BIO-GROUP MEDICAL SYSTEM) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIO-GROUP MEDICAL SYSTEM – Earlier EU figurative mark BIOGROUP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62025TA0450: Case T-450/25: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – Peña de Paz v EUIPO – Cuchy & Charly (MICUIR HANDMADE IN SPAIN) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MICUIR HANDMADE IN SPAIN – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case back to the Cancellation Division – Admissibility of the action before the General Court – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)
• CELEX:62026TN0371: Case T-371/26: Action brought on 11 June 2026 – IPSO v ECB
• CELEX:62024TA0540: Case T-540/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – RH v Commission (Grave professional misconduct, conflict of interest) (Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance – OLAF investigation – Commission decision imposing an administrative penalty – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures under the Financial Regulation and the financial regulation applicable to the 11th EDF or from being selected for the implementation of funds governed by those regulations – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Grave professional misconduct – Non-contractual liability)
• CELEX:62026CN0513: Case C-513/26, Latvenergo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vidzemes rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 19 May 2026 – AS Latvenergo v SIA BMB Timber
• CELEX:62025TA0361: Case T-361/25, Brenntag: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 1 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Brenntag GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Article 27(1) and (2) of Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 7(1), Article 7(2)(a), Article 20(2) and Article 30 of Directive 2008/118/EC – Irregularity occurring during the movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Levying of excise duty due to the absence of an accompanying document specific to excise goods)
• CELEX:62026CN0405: Case C-405/26, Syndyk masy upadłości Getin Noble Bank: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 28 April 2026 – Syndyk masy upadłości Getin Noble Bank S.A. w upadłości v FV
• CELEX:62025CA0014: Case C-14/25, Thüringer Aufbaubank: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – Thüringer Aufbaubank v LN (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 25 – Authentic instruments – Certification as a European Enforcement Order – Enforcement proceedings – Article 21(2) – Review as to its substance prohibited in the Member State of enforcement of the certification – Notarial instrument formally drawn up before the entry into force of that regulation – Temporal scope of that regulation disregarded by the competent authorities of the Member State of origin)
• CELEX:62026TN0411: Case T-411/26, Holcim Magyarország: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) made on 22 May 2026 – Holcim Magyarország Kft. v Energiaügyi Minisztérium Nemzeti Klímavédelmi Hatóság